高速公路帶來便利?還是破壞?

高速公路帶來便利?還是破壞?

更新於 發佈於 閱讀時間約 8 分鐘
Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances, but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Generally speaking, people have a tendency to accept that motorways facilitate the convenience of commuting, traveling and shipment. It is doubtful whether many people know the problems caused by motorways. There is a lot of evidence to connect motorways with destruction of natural ecology. I feel the question is very controversial whether human beings’ needs are more meaningful.

Many people agree that motorways represent development of towns to cities. It brings positive industrial progress and connection for stimulating economic growth. Efficiency is the magical word for activists to promote motorways construction. Yet, as far as I am concerned, traffic congestion on motorways is a serious problem nowadays in many countries. Cars impasse during rush hour does not help people travel more quickly. Huge number of cars burning fossil fuels cause air pollution. Clearly then it also generates dangerouslevels of sound pollution. Despite the fact that governments take several measures to compensate local residents, motorways construction would disturb natural scenery and affect wild animals’ living environment. Local eco-system could not be returned to its original view by reinforced concrete.

The government clearly has the responsibility to help reduce the number of cars on motorways by execution of ride share policy during peak hours. It is therefore a good idea to encourage citizens to take public transportation not only lower volume of automobiles but also decrease destruction of pollution. Surroundings around the motorways are designed as commercial districts which move local people to residential areas far away from motorways for better living quality and also help to raise the rate of local employment.

It seems to me if the government spend more money on environmental protection, it is absolutely vital that both sides would probably be more balanced. Take local railway and motorway connected with Hualien and Taitung for example, Hua-tung Highway (Hualien-Taitung Coastal Highway) built by the Japanese government in 1933 and completed by current Taiwan government in 1968. The government at that time believed that “faith will move mountains,” and did not concern itself about natural environment. Mudslides and debris flow disaster which happens during typhoon seasons all the time not only affect traffic connection but also caused big number of deaths. However, Hua-Tung Line, Eastern Line of the Taiwan Railway built by the Japanese government started from 1910 and fully completed never has similar issue because it spent more time on research to reduce the influence of destruction to the environment. As a result of that, long term consideration is more significant than short-term needs.

avatar-img
petitechi 小琦宇宙的沙龍
5會員
31內容數
英文寫作練習,透過不同主題設定,運用英文思辨之能力,以增強英文寫作技巧。
留言
avatar-img
留言分享你的想法!
台灣職場近幾年有哪些變化?所帶來的影響為何?
未來的教育樣貌會如何?哪些趨勢會影響並改變教育的發展模式?
獲得亮眼成績的運動員,其實均擁有類似的人格特質。這些人格特質不只適用於運動場上,也值得一般人學習模仿,應用於人生中。
台灣職場近幾年有哪些變化?所帶來的影響為何?
未來的教育樣貌會如何?哪些趨勢會影響並改變教育的發展模式?
獲得亮眼成績的運動員,其實均擁有類似的人格特質。這些人格特質不只適用於運動場上,也值得一般人學習模仿,應用於人生中。