天文學札記(2):黑洞理論正好反證宇宙大爆炸說不成立
黑洞理論站立在當質量極大時,造成時空塌陷,於是產生黑洞,時空皆不存在。而宇宙大爆炸說則認為可把現有宇宙反推全部壓回成一個時空奇點,到了零時開始宇宙大爆炸。兩論實為矛盾之論,一成立另一即不成立。如黑洞理論為真(現今觀測也證明為真),則如果真有那個宇宙發生的奇點,則那時的整個後來的宇宙的一切物質,全被壓至極小,此時質量無限大,產生一個大黑洞。如果奇點說為真,則此時係質量無限大,需要極大能量才能壓縮至此,但誰施與此一額外大能量,難不成是神?而壓至見不到踪影的黑洞,而後無時間的黑洞到了零時就不知無比巨大的能量從何外加而來讓它能大爆炸,產生了一個宇宙。用此一簡明的說明,即可知現今人云亦云的所謂宇宙由大爆炸成立之說,不是物理上的實際,而是附屬於神創世的宗教,使用其大能的手像煙花(primeval fireworks)一樣散開而抖出一個包袱,那就是宇宙,因為,如果在奇點狀能,依能量守恒,其維繫此一極重質量的粒子堆(或如有學者指出係原始的量子original quantum)已是束縛了能量全部,如果再有大能量將宇宙爆出來,除非此大能量來自神的外施的額外無限大能,無怪乎天主教教皇都對宇宙爆炸說興高采烈,認為與《創世紀》相符。而且既然全部收成一個點,那麼所有的基本粒子皆緊密將能量收束在相互引力上,何時有額外能量造成爆炸,而且由此一極小而質量極重的粒子堆再開放出了巨量的全宇宙所有的物質亦甚怪異,有人以量子漲落說(quantum fluctuation)來指出其成立性,但被緊束的粒子堆如何能有機會出現隨機的少許短時間內的自由的量子能量,並因而大到擊破緊束的粒子堆束縛而引發大爆炸嗎! 霍金為了解決其原先同意的奇點問題,後來以量子力學,用了數學的威克轉動(Wick rotation),算出了一個宇宙起於虛數時間(imaginary time)的純數學去避開奇點,即是指有四度的空間,排除了時間,說明實無奇點時,宇宙不是奇點開始,而是數學演算裡得出的一個小宇宙是開始。但如此一來,此一虛時宇宙模型不就證明宇宙自始即存在,雖則它本來較小,尚未發散到如日後。
如此看來,方今的所謂宇宙大爆炸說,實屬漏洞百出,經不起檢驗的臆說了。(劉有恒,2022)
Astronomical Notes (2): The black hole theory just contradicts the Big Bang theory
The black hole theory stands when the mass is extremely large, causing space-time to collapse, thus producing black holes, and space-time does not exist. The Big Bang theory believes that the existing universe can be pushed back into a space-time singularity, and the big bang will begin at zero. The two theories are actually contradictory theories, and if one is established, the other is not established. If the theory of black holes is true (and today's observations prove to be true), then if there really is a singularity in that universe, then all the matter of the entire later universe at that time is pressed to the extremely small, and the mass is infinitely large, producing a large black hole. If the singularity is true, then the mass of the system at this time is infinite, and it takes a great deal of energy to compress it to this point, but who gives this extra large energy, is it difficult to become a god? And pressed to the invisible black hole, and then the timeless black hole reaches zero, I don't know where the incomparably huge energy comes from to make it a big bang, creating a universe. With this concise explanation, it is known that the so-called universe established by the Big Bang is not physically practical, but a religion attached to God's creation, using its powerful hands to spread out like primeval fireworks and shake out a burden, that is, the universe, because, if the singular energy is conserved according to energy, it maintains this extremely heavy mass particle pile (or if some scholars point out that it is the original quantum). If there is a great energy that explodes the universe, unless this great energy comes from the extra infinite power of God's external power, it is no wonder that the Catholic Pope is happy to say that the cosmic explosion is consistent with genesis. And since all the harvest is a point, then all the elementary particles are tightly bound energy in mutual gravity, when there is additional energy to cause an explosion, and thus a very small and extremely heavy particle pile opens up a huge amount of all the universe's matter is also very strange, some people use quantum fluctuation to point out its validity, but how can the tightly bound particle pile have the opportunity to appear randomly a little free quantum energy for a short period of time, And thus big enough to break through the shackles of the tightly bound particle pile and cause a big bang! In order to solve the problem of the singularity that he originally agreed to, Hawking later used quantum mechanics to use the mathematical Wick rotation to calculate a pure mathematics of the universe from imaginary time to avoid the singularity, that is, it refers to the space of four degrees, excluding time, indicating that when there is no singularity, the universe is not the beginning of the singularity, but a small universe derived from mathematical calculus is the beginning. But in this way, this imaginary model of the universe does not prove that the universe existed from the beginning, although it was originally small and has not yet diverged into the future. From this point of view, Fang Jin's so-called big bang theory is really full of loopholes and cannot withstand the test of speculation. (Liu Youheng, 2022)