投資領域聚集了大量高智商的人,為什麼常常跑不贏大盤?查理·蒙格 | Charles Munger

更新 發佈閱讀 20 分鐘

In the investment world, people, there was an enormous amount of high IQ people trying

to be more skillful and normal.

And I don't really imagine another activity that gets so much attention.

And weird things have happened.

And years ago, one of our local investment counseling shops, a very big one, they were

looking for a way to get an advantage over other investment counseling shops.

And the reason this follows.

We've got all these brilliant young people from Wharton and Harvard and so forth, and

they work so hard trying to understand business and market trends and everything else.

And if we just ask each one of our most brilliant men for their single best idea, then create

a formula with this collection of best ideas, we would outperform averages by a big amount.

And that's the implausible to them because they were ill educated.

That's what happens when you go to Harvard and Wharton.

And so they tried it out, and of course it failed utterly.

So they tried it again and it failed utterly, and they tried the third time and it also

failed.

And of course what they were looking for is the equivalent of the alchemists of centuries

ago who wanted to turn and led into gold.

They thought it would just buy a lot of lead and wager.

Imagine you walked over to turn into gold, that would be a good way to make money.

So this counseling shop was looking for the equivalent of turning lead into gold.

And of course it didn't work.

I could have told them that they didn't ask me.

Nothing.

The interesting thing about this situation is that this is a very intelligent group of

people that's come from all over the world.

You've got a lot of bright people from China where people tend to average out a little

smarter.

The issue is very simple.

There's simple question.

Why did that plausible idea fail?

Just think about it for a minute.

You've all been to fancy educational institutions.

I'll bet you there's hardly one in the audience who knows why that thing failed.

That's a pretty ridiculous demonstration I make.

How can you not know that?

But that's when you should be able to answer.

It shows how hard it is to be rational.

I'm something very simple.

How hard it is, how many kind of crazy ideas people have and they don't work.

You don't even know why they don't work even though it's perfectly obvious.

They've been properly educated.

Now a place like Bertger Hathaway or even the Daily Journal, we've done better than

average.

Now there's a question, why has that happened?

The answer is pretty simple.

We tried to do less.

We never had the illusion we could just hire a bunch of bright young people and they would

know more than anybody about CanSoup and Aerospace and utilities and so on and so on.

We never had that dream.

We never thought we could get really useful information on all subjects like Jen Kramer

who tends to have.

And we always realized that if we worked very hard we could find a few things where

we were right and that a few things were enough and that that was a reasonable expectation.

That is a very different way to approach the process.

And if you had asked Warren Buffett the same thing that this investment counseling did,

give me your best idea this year and you just followed Warren's best idea, you would

find it worked beautifully.

But he would try to know who he would give you one or two stocks.

He had a lot more limited ambitions.

I had a grandfather who was very useful to me.

My mother's grandfather and he was a pioneer and he came out to Iowa with no money but

youth and health and took it away from the Indians.

He fought in the Black Hawk Wars and he stayed there and he bought cheap land and he was

aggressive and intelligent and so forth.

And eventually he was the richest man in the town on the bank and highly regarded and

a huge family and a very happy life.

He had the attitude.

Having come out to Iowa when the land was not much more than a dollar an acre and having

stayed there until that black top so created a modern rich civilization and some of the

best land in the world.

His attitude was that a favored life like his when you were located in the right place.

He just got a few opportunities if you lived to be about 90.

And the trick in coming out well was seizing a few opportunities that were your fair share

that came along when they did.

And he told that story over and over again to the grandchildren around him all summer

and my mother who had no interest in money remembered the story and told it to me.

But I'm not my mother's natural imitator and I knew Grandpa was right and so I always

knew from the very first little boy that the opportunities that were important that were

going to come to me were few and that the trick was to prepare myself for seizing the

few that came.

This is not the attitude that they have at a big investment counseling thing.

They know they study a million things they can know a million things.

And of course the result is almost nobody can outperform an index.

Whereas I sit here with my Gary Journal stock, my Berkshire Hathaway stock, my holdings at

the Lillos Asian fund, my Costco stock.

And of course I am outperforming everybody.

I'm 95 years old and I'm afraid we never have a transaction.

And the answer is I'm right and I'm wrong.

And that's why it's worked for me and not for them.

Another issue of course that's happened in the world of stock picking where all this

money and effort goes in to try to be rational is that we've had a really horrible thing

happen to the investment counseling class.

And that is these index funds have come along and they basically beat everybody.

And not only that, the amount by which they beat everybody is roughly the amount of cost

of running the operation and the human changes in investments.

So we have a whole profession is basically being paid for accomplishing practically nothing.

This is very peculiar.

This is not the case with bowel surgery or even the criminal defense bar or the law or

something that will hold profession where the chosen activity they've selected they can't do anything.

Now in the old days the people in the profession always had some of this problem.

And they rationalized as follows, we are saving our clients from the insurance salesman and

the stock broker, the standard stock broker that serves the active trader.

And they were saving people from the life insurance salesman and

the hustling stock broker who liked active trading.

And I suppose in the sense that the investing class is still saving those people from an even worse fate.

But it is very peculiar when a whole profession that works so hard and

is so admirable and the members of which we are delighted when they marry into our families.

And they just can't do what the profession is really trying to do which is get better than average results.

How is that profession handling this terrible situation?

As index investing gets more and more popular and including that a lot of fancy places.

Well, I get a very simple answer, they're handling with denial.

They have a horrible problem they can't fix so they just treat it as non-existent.

This is a very stupid way to handle a problem.

Now it may be good when you're thinking about your own death what you can't fix and

just denial all the way to the end.

But in all the practical fields of life this problem thoroughly understood is half solved or

better coped with. So it's wrong to have all these people in just a state of denial and doing what they always did year after year.

And hoping the world will keep paying them for it even though an unmanaged index is virtually certain to do better.

And I don't have any solution for this problem. I do think that index investing,

if everybody did it won't work, but for another considerable period index investing it's going to work better than

active stock picking where you try to know a lot.


留言
avatar-img
留言分享你的想法!
avatar-img
張彰(hi)的沙龍
0會員
2內容數
你可能也想看
Thumbnail
在股市投資中,只有少數異能人士才能真正成為贏家,發現其思維模式是相對高維的存在,而絕大多數的投資者則處於高危、高度危險的韭菜中。本文探討如何透過負責、誠實、善良、踏實的思維模式,讓每位投資者都有機會跨越維度,成為真正的贏家。
Thumbnail
在股市投資中,只有少數異能人士才能真正成為贏家,發現其思維模式是相對高維的存在,而絕大多數的投資者則處於高危、高度危險的韭菜中。本文探討如何透過負責、誠實、善良、踏實的思維模式,讓每位投資者都有機會跨越維度,成為真正的贏家。
Thumbnail
哈囉 大家好 我是宥爸 股票市場有幾千支標的 要買哪一種才會賺大錢咧? 答案很簡單:[買你懂的股票] 想要財富自由 其實並不需要買進每一檔股票 查理蒙格對於能力圈表示 [如果你不清楚界限在哪裡,就不能算是一種能力。 如果你不知道你的能力範圍在哪裡,你就會身陷於災難之中]。 能
Thumbnail
哈囉 大家好 我是宥爸 股票市場有幾千支標的 要買哪一種才會賺大錢咧? 答案很簡單:[買你懂的股票] 想要財富自由 其實並不需要買進每一檔股票 查理蒙格對於能力圈表示 [如果你不清楚界限在哪裡,就不能算是一種能力。 如果你不知道你的能力範圍在哪裡,你就會身陷於災難之中]。 能
Thumbnail
股市如同一場遊戲,但這場遊戲並非終結後才會揭曉勝負。在投資的世界裡,每一位買賣股票的人都有其獨特的原因和動機。 然而,保持謙虛的態度對於投資者來說至關重要,就像查理蒙格所言,「避免沈迷於短線的漲跌遊戲,而應該著眼於長期的投資策略」。 二、以下分享一些名詞解釋:
Thumbnail
股市如同一場遊戲,但這場遊戲並非終結後才會揭曉勝負。在投資的世界裡,每一位買賣股票的人都有其獨特的原因和動機。 然而,保持謙虛的態度對於投資者來說至關重要,就像查理蒙格所言,「避免沈迷於短線的漲跌遊戲,而應該著眼於長期的投資策略」。 二、以下分享一些名詞解釋:
Thumbnail
這個世界太複雜,不會任憑你採取百分之百的行動,就可以決定百分之百的結果;它們都由同一件事驅動:這是一場七十億名玩家與數不清的行動組成的賽局,你只是其中的一環。不受你行動所產生的意外衝擊,可能遠高於你謹慎行動所產生的結果。
Thumbnail
這個世界太複雜,不會任憑你採取百分之百的行動,就可以決定百分之百的結果;它們都由同一件事驅動:這是一場七十億名玩家與數不清的行動組成的賽局,你只是其中的一環。不受你行動所產生的意外衝擊,可能遠高於你謹慎行動所產生的結果。
Thumbnail
人腦畢竟不是機器,情緒也經常干擾大腦的運作,有時候連自己都不一定能理解自身的情緒如何運作,更無法理解所有人集合而成的市場情緒變化,當投資人受市場情緒影響而做愚蠢的決定,代價都非常昂貴,而市場的極度樂觀與繁榮,有部分原因就來自於多數人都犯錯,所以股市名言是眾人貪婪時應該要恐懼。
Thumbnail
人腦畢竟不是機器,情緒也經常干擾大腦的運作,有時候連自己都不一定能理解自身的情緒如何運作,更無法理解所有人集合而成的市場情緒變化,當投資人受市場情緒影響而做愚蠢的決定,代價都非常昂貴,而市場的極度樂觀與繁榮,有部分原因就來自於多數人都犯錯,所以股市名言是眾人貪婪時應該要恐懼。
Thumbnail
"The world is full of foolish gamblers and they will not do as well as the patient investors." "It's waiting that helps you as an investor, and a lot
Thumbnail
"The world is full of foolish gamblers and they will not do as well as the patient investors." "It's waiting that helps you as an investor, and a lot
Thumbnail
投資看對跟看錯的風報比量化數據是非常重要的 多數投資人看錯很厲害,會閃的很快 相對的看對也會只賺零錢 因為他沒有真正賺到財富的成功量化經驗值,也沒有任何投資策略 所以拉長他的投資週期報酬率就是在股市瞎忙 相反在股市長期生存的贏家不會害怕看錯 因為要的是看對時候可以掌握到的財富 看對
Thumbnail
投資看對跟看錯的風報比量化數據是非常重要的 多數投資人看錯很厲害,會閃的很快 相對的看對也會只賺零錢 因為他沒有真正賺到財富的成功量化經驗值,也沒有任何投資策略 所以拉長他的投資週期報酬率就是在股市瞎忙 相反在股市長期生存的贏家不會害怕看錯 因為要的是看對時候可以掌握到的財富 看對
Thumbnail
市場裡很多"老的投機者,充滿市場經驗值,但失去勇氣" 主因都是被市場波動的情緒打擊太多次 AI可以不斷進化是因為它們只有經驗累積沒有情感 人性累積經驗的過程都會有情緒記憶不斷跟著累積 而市場競爭對手都是有情緒的一群人 所以任何看盤軟體也沒製造出致富的AI方程式
Thumbnail
市場裡很多"老的投機者,充滿市場經驗值,但失去勇氣" 主因都是被市場波動的情緒打擊太多次 AI可以不斷進化是因為它們只有經驗累積沒有情感 人性累積經驗的過程都會有情緒記憶不斷跟著累積 而市場競爭對手都是有情緒的一群人 所以任何看盤軟體也沒製造出致富的AI方程式
追蹤感興趣的內容從 Google News 追蹤更多 vocus 的最新精選內容追蹤 Google News