"Changing the Algorithm of Life" -Movie: American Psycho

更新 發佈閱讀 12 分鐘


2000 American Psycho

In my mind, having a house, a car, cats and dogs, and a group of so-called “good” friends—being able to show off wealth, talk about art, discuss wine, and listen to music together—that should already be the happiest kind of life. So why do some of those people care more than I do about others’ expressions and reactions? Why do they cling to trivial, ridiculous logic in places I would never even notice, stubbornly refusing to admit fault—so stubborn that they would rather drag the whole world down with them than let anyone else have peace?

They keep twisting their arguments. When one angle no longer works, they jump to another without any logic. They invent one strange story after another to divert responsibility and attention. Gradually, people lose respect for them, and the atmosphere around them becomes increasingly uncomfortable. Aside from their money, no one wants to get close—because even one extra sentence of conversation feels like suffering.

These people already possess things others may never reach in a lifetime. Yet no amount of admiration or envy seems visible to them. Instead, they indulge in bullying others, humiliating them, pretending to be victims, ignoring collective interests—and chasing a very short-sighted kind of pleasure.

No one in this world can completely surpass another person in everything. I once heard a story: a monk steamed a bun for himself. Others might make buns sweeter, more fragrant, or with better ingredients—but he still preferred the one he made himself.

It’s like painting. The person who loves a painting the most is always the painter. Even world-famous artworks—say, those by Picasso—no matter how expensive they are, people who don’t understand them simply don’t understand them. If it weren’t because everyone says they are valuable, would collectors truly want to hang them at home and invite like-minded people to discuss the artist’s ideas, personality, brushwork, composition, and use of color?

Slow and indifferent as I am, I don’t even pay attention to whose face is printed on banknotes. Whatever that person accomplished or how great their achievements were—I may never have thought about it, or I simply don’t remember. So when I feel inexplicable malice or deliberate targeting from these so-called “rich” individuals, what I feel most is confusion—something difficult to understand and even harder to believe.

Unfortunately, in this “power-admiring” world, people tend to rationalize the behavior of these “elites.” If they make a “careless mistake,” any accountability becomes “hysterical persecution.” But a “nobody” must remain cautious at every moment, argue over every detail, and defend themselves endlessly—almost to the point of exhaustion—just to “grow through hardship,” as if that were only natural.

If we ask why so many people choose to “lie flat,” isn’t it the result of learned helplessness? Others’ success offers no practical reference, while one’s own attempts are met again and again with unreasonable, unfair, and exaggerated obstacles. Under such conditions, it feels easier not to think about tomorrow at all—just to live one more day comfortably and count that as a victory.

Perhaps the lowest and highest classes share one thing in common: neither truly considers the public nor the collective future. When the “answer” cannot be changed, people change the “algorithm.” In an environment swinging between extreme malice and selective goodwill, prioritizing individual survival becomes a kind of survival wisdom.

After all, it was the “elites” who first rewrote the algorithm—creating precedents that shattered consensus, encouraged fragmentation, and rejected cooperation, all to secure their own power. As the hearts of the “nobodies” drift farther from the "mainstream", who can really be blamed? After watching this film, would anyone truly sympathize with the protagonist and call his life “unfortunate”?

I believe that one day, all the lonely and suppressed “nobodies” will collectively reach a breaking point. Only then will they find ways to reconnect and resist some of the elite classes that has long since lost its sanity and moral grounding. But before any larger reckoning arrives, the best choice is simple: stay as far away from such people as possible—no matter how much money they seem to offer—and protect your own life first.

And perhaps even death—or some form of ending—is not entirely tragic for those who appear glamorous on the surface yet remain hollow and fragile inside, incapable of facing reality.

Until the day of reckoning comes, I will keep believing this:

Don’t look back—just keep moving forward.



留言
avatar-img
Big Softshell of Glassy Snail
45會員
428內容數
透過創作,表達對生活的反思和觀察。 Through creation, express reflections and observations on life. 推薦喜歡的流行文化作品 Share pop culture picks. 寫寫同人小說 Create Fanfictions.
你可能也想看
Thumbnail
債券投資,不只是高資產族群的遊戲 在傳統的投資觀念中,海外債券(Overseas Bonds)常被貼上「高資產族群專屬」的標籤。過去動輒 1 萬甚至 10 萬美元的最低申購門檻,讓許多想尋求穩定配息的小資族望而卻步。 然而,在股市波動劇烈的環境下,尋求穩定的美元現金流與被動收入成為許多投資人
Thumbnail
債券投資,不只是高資產族群的遊戲 在傳統的投資觀念中,海外債券(Overseas Bonds)常被貼上「高資產族群專屬」的標籤。過去動輒 1 萬甚至 10 萬美元的最低申購門檻,讓許多想尋求穩定配息的小資族望而卻步。 然而,在股市波動劇烈的環境下,尋求穩定的美元現金流與被動收入成為許多投資人
Thumbnail
透過川普的近期債券交易揭露,探討債券作為資產配置中「穩定磐石」的重要性。文章分析降息對債券的潛在影響,以及股神巴菲特的操作策略。並介紹玉山證券「小額債」平臺,如何讓小資族也能低門檻參與海外債券市場,實現「低門檻、低波動、固定收益」的務實投資方式。
Thumbnail
透過川普的近期債券交易揭露,探討債券作為資產配置中「穩定磐石」的重要性。文章分析降息對債券的潛在影響,以及股神巴菲特的操作策略。並介紹玉山證券「小額債」平臺,如何讓小資族也能低門檻參與海外債券市場,實現「低門檻、低波動、固定收益」的務實投資方式。
Thumbnail
解析「債券」如何成為資產配置中的穩定錨,提供低風險高回報的投資選項。 藉由玉山證券的低門檻債券服務,投資者可輕鬆入手,平衡風險並穩定財務。
Thumbnail
解析「債券」如何成為資產配置中的穩定錨,提供低風險高回報的投資選項。 藉由玉山證券的低門檻債券服務,投資者可輕鬆入手,平衡風險並穩定財務。
Thumbnail
相較於波動較大的股票,債券能提供固定現金流,而玉山證券推出的小額債,更以1000 美元的低門檻,讓學生與新手也能參與全球優質企業債投資。玉山E-Trader平台即時報價、條件式篩選與清楚的交易流程等特色,大幅降低投資難度,對於希望分散風險、建立穩定現金流的人來說,玉山小額債是一個值得嘗試的理財起點。
Thumbnail
相較於波動較大的股票,債券能提供固定現金流,而玉山證券推出的小額債,更以1000 美元的低門檻,讓學生與新手也能參與全球優質企業債投資。玉山E-Trader平台即時報價、條件式篩選與清楚的交易流程等特色,大幅降低投資難度,對於希望分散風險、建立穩定現金流的人來說,玉山小額債是一個值得嘗試的理財起點。
Thumbnail
本片的美術設計讀到,也契合著主角Patrick Bateman高雅殺人犯的生活。我想Patrick Batema和朋友間的名片較勁,對於字體、紙質、印刷技巧的鑽牛角尖,最後讓自己因為輸了而怒不可遏,處於暴走邊緣,絕對讓不少觀眾會心一笑。
Thumbnail
本片的美術設計讀到,也契合著主角Patrick Bateman高雅殺人犯的生活。我想Patrick Batema和朋友間的名片較勁,對於字體、紙質、印刷技巧的鑽牛角尖,最後讓自己因為輸了而怒不可遏,處於暴走邊緣,絕對讓不少觀眾會心一笑。
Thumbnail
這是一篇,有些乾貨但又沒有什麼營養的文章,如果你看過這部電影,也對其感到困惑,可以點進來討論~
Thumbnail
這是一篇,有些乾貨但又沒有什麼營養的文章,如果你看過這部電影,也對其感到困惑,可以點進來討論~
Thumbnail
作為一部形式主義的作品,千萬別把「美國殺人魔」當成一個角色,克里斯汀·貝爾飾演的派翠克·貝曼,在電影一開頭就很直白的告訴觀眾:「派翠克·貝曼是種概念,抽象的概念」。在他那麼精緻、自律的日常規範下,他自剖的口白有種過度解說的干擾,到了最後才又發現是那麼必須......
Thumbnail
作為一部形式主義的作品,千萬別把「美國殺人魔」當成一個角色,克里斯汀·貝爾飾演的派翠克·貝曼,在電影一開頭就很直白的告訴觀眾:「派翠克·貝曼是種概念,抽象的概念」。在他那麼精緻、自律的日常規範下,他自剖的口白有種過度解說的干擾,到了最後才又發現是那麼必須......
追蹤感興趣的內容從 Google News 追蹤更多 vocus 的最新精選內容追蹤 Google News