Supporting Taiwan: A US-Japan-Australia Trilateral Alliance

閱讀時間約 18 分鐘
This article was co-authored by Kuan-Ting Chen and Huynh Tam Sang (黃心光), a lecturer at Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities’ Faculty of International Relations, a research fellow at the Taiwan NextGen Foundation, and a non-resident WSD-Handa Fellow at Pacific Forum.
***
In January, the foreign and defense ministers of the US and Japan met virtually to discuss closer defense ties. The virtual meeting was in the spotlight as Washington and Tokyo are at loggerheads with China over Beijing’s growing coercive actions in the Indo-Pacific. The ministers highlighted the importance of peace and security in the Taiwan Strait and underlined the resolve to work closely to “deter and, if necessary, respond to regional destabilizing activities”.
The virtual meeting promised a five-year agreement to share the cost of Washington’s military presence in Japan, to be signed in the forthcoming time. It would enhance the bilateral relationship and provide more impetus for Japan to prepare for any contingencies near its surroundings, including the waters around Taiwan.
Japan, Australia, and the US
Japan’s determination, as evidenced in the Reciprocal Access Agreement (RAA) signed recently between Tokyo and Canberra, showed the East Asian power’s willingness to share the burden with the US while being ready to play a more vital role in preserving peace and stability in the region. Without a doubt, this defense pact aims to strengthen the quasi-alliance between Tokyo and Canberra, the two closest allies of the US in the region. This pact is also a major step towards equipping the two middle powers with a framework to protect themselves from Beijing’s aggression.
Pundits are watching the enhanced relationship with cautious optimism as Taipei has figured prominently in Tokyo’s recent political discourse. In December, former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe called for the sharing of new defense technologies between Japan, the US and Taiwan. In Abe’s words, military adventurism pursued by China “could be suicidal to say the least”, and the sharing of knowledge and technology could deter China from provoking and bullying Taiwan.
For its part, Australia has been more vocal in supporting Taiwan as well. In November 2021, Australian Defense Minister Peter Dutton said that the price of Australian support for Taiwan in a military conflict would be lower than the cost of inaction. Dutton also voiced an alarming signal: “If Taiwan is taken, surely the Senkakus are next”. It has come at a critical moment when Australia has been more in line with the US and Japan on the security in the Taiwan Strait.
The Biden administration has sought to flex its muscles to deter Chinese menace in the Taiwan Strait, and described Taiwan as an “anchor” in its web of allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific. Such a move indicated the US’s inclusion of Taiwan “in a broader Asia strategy as opposed to limiting it as a subset of its China policy”, as pointed out by Russell Hsiao, executive director of the Global Taiwan Institute in Washington.
Washington’s firm commitment to Taipei and its strengthened ties with Tokyo and Canberra could provide Taipei with leverage to stay unwavering amid Beijing’s reckless and assertive behavior. To manage the rise of China, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan described a “latticework”—a multidirectional approach that America is forging to cooperate with its alliances and partnerships more effectively.
Strengthening the latticework for Taiwan
With their shared commitment to regional security and prosperity, the US, Japan, and Australia are well-positioned to work more closely to strengthen their assurance for Taiwan’s security. As close allies of the US, Japan and Australia share the need to uphold the rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific region and are concerned about Beijing’s attempts to undermine regional security.
Bilateral agreements, like the defense agreement between Japan and Australia, or AUKUS—a strategic defense alliance between Australia, the UK and the US—and potential military pack between the US and Japan are significant as they are indications of like-minded countries seeking to join hands to deter Beijing’s coercive activities. However, these pacts do not have Taiwan, or more specifically the support of Taiwan’s security and stability in the Taiwan Strait, at its core.
Additionally, Washington’s allies are worried about the reliability and long-term commitments of the superpower. To put it bluntly, President Richard Nixon’s troop withdrawal from South Vietnam in 1973 and the Biden administration’s Afghan pullout in 2021 both have some nuanced implications for its allies and partners. Last year, President Biden’s statements about defending Taiwan were welcomed, but also confusing and revealed a lack of discipline or planning.
The good news is America has made tremendous efforts to re-engage with allies and rebuild its reputation in the Indo-Pacific under the slogan “America is back. Diplomacy is back.” As such, the incumbent US president needs a refreshing approach towards supporting Taiwan—Washington’s de facto ally. Seeking to strengthen ties between the US and its allies is not obsolete, but Washington should reframe this strategy to support Taiwan effectively.
Towards a trilateral alliance
Seen this way, the US, Japan, and Australia should coordinate to explore initiatives to support Taiwan, which is a beacon of democracy and one of the essential determinants of economic resilience in East Asia. The trilateral alliance should match the focus of the three members, and more military spending seems to be a must to buttress their determination.
The potential trilateral alliance needs to be predicated upon shared values, moral standards, and prudent assessment. Additionally, dialogues organized to share mutual trust and potential frameworks between countries involved to address common challenges should be prioritized, particularly amid constraints of face-to-face diplomatic events caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, the US, Japan, and Australia should not take this chance for granted. These countries could face distractions from COVID-19 and obstacles to face-to-face summits. The spread of the highly infectious Omicron variant is surging in Australia, has been on an upward trend in Japan, and continues to send numbers of daily cases soaring in America. Though the Australian federal government has embraced a hardline stance towards China, some Australian officials have voiced concerns over a more determined approach aimed at deterring China. And due to the surge of COVID-19, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida announced his decision to abandon plans to visit the US and Australia.
These hindrances could be addressed with the help of coordinated actions and goodwill from these like-minded countries. And the US should take the lead by engaging Japan and Australia in potential frameworks of cooperation. To put it shortly, this new security alliance formation requires the US’s leading role as the bandmaster.
It is critical that these three nations, a great power and two middle-sized powers, share the values of freedom and democracy with Taiwan. The multilateral cooperation between the three Asian-Pacific countries could provide a shield to defend Taiwan while fortifying their ties. This year is essential for a trilateral alliance embraced to cement the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait as tensions rise sharply with Beijing’s intimidation.
為什麼會看到廣告
    <p>和我一起,從全世界的公共議題中發現共通問題,運用大格局,找到正確的解方。</p>
    留言0
    查看全部
    avatar-img
    發表第一個留言支持創作者!
    距離上次捷克議長韋德齊訪臺至今不到一年,我們又驚見歷史的鬧劇,再次重演。
    高中在美國求學,除了語言、文化的衝擊,對於教育模式,當然也有不同的感受。 我印象最深的是「美國歷史」這堂課。教授課程的,是來自新英格蘭的中年白人男性,路易斯先生,大學主修歷史以及電腦科學。  在講新英格蘭開拓史之前,他先談到整個美洲的「發現新大陸史觀」。首先,先放了一部電影給同學們看:【#ID4星際
    理論上,以一個畢業於哈佛大學、紐約大學的國家領導人,在過去擔任總統八年,常以「熟悉國際政治外交,深受美國信任」為榮,應該不至於在「不」安全的研討會發表一系列對自己友邦「不」信任,對自己國軍「不」信任,對自己國民「不」信任的四不立場。 但是他卻打破我們的想像。
    最近看到紐約時報中文版的一篇文章 美國的川普,中國的「川建國」,其中一小段是這樣的   「在中國,人們戲稱川普的中文名字是川建國。那是因為建國是共產黨愛國者中一個普遍的革命人名。它在諷刺地暗示川普對美國的治理不當實際上是在鞏固習近平的政權。」 裡面也提到,川普在任的幾年,國家更分裂,對於氣候變遷
    Throughout my tenure at Taipei City Government, I sought to actualize an open door policy and make my office a one-stop shop for all members of Taipei
    這次拜訪的是位於六腳鄉的育家種苗場。台灣今年不斷的面臨各種作物產銷失衡的問題,而種苗場就是第一線的預警單位,從種苗場所販售的作物量,大概就可以推估出今年是否有哪些作物有生產過剩的危機,
    距離上次捷克議長韋德齊訪臺至今不到一年,我們又驚見歷史的鬧劇,再次重演。
    高中在美國求學,除了語言、文化的衝擊,對於教育模式,當然也有不同的感受。 我印象最深的是「美國歷史」這堂課。教授課程的,是來自新英格蘭的中年白人男性,路易斯先生,大學主修歷史以及電腦科學。  在講新英格蘭開拓史之前,他先談到整個美洲的「發現新大陸史觀」。首先,先放了一部電影給同學們看:【#ID4星際
    理論上,以一個畢業於哈佛大學、紐約大學的國家領導人,在過去擔任總統八年,常以「熟悉國際政治外交,深受美國信任」為榮,應該不至於在「不」安全的研討會發表一系列對自己友邦「不」信任,對自己國軍「不」信任,對自己國民「不」信任的四不立場。 但是他卻打破我們的想像。
    最近看到紐約時報中文版的一篇文章 美國的川普,中國的「川建國」,其中一小段是這樣的   「在中國,人們戲稱川普的中文名字是川建國。那是因為建國是共產黨愛國者中一個普遍的革命人名。它在諷刺地暗示川普對美國的治理不當實際上是在鞏固習近平的政權。」 裡面也提到,川普在任的幾年,國家更分裂,對於氣候變遷
    Throughout my tenure at Taipei City Government, I sought to actualize an open door policy and make my office a one-stop shop for all members of Taipei
    這次拜訪的是位於六腳鄉的育家種苗場。台灣今年不斷的面臨各種作物產銷失衡的問題,而種苗場就是第一線的預警單位,從種苗場所販售的作物量,大概就可以推估出今年是否有哪些作物有生產過剩的危機,
    你可能也想看
    Google News 追蹤
    Thumbnail
    《红色警戒之台湾之战》(4)                         美军篇章……承诺 开战前24小时。 瑞士日内瓦。 中国外交部部长王毅和美国国务卿布林肯在瑞士日内瓦见了面,面对面的外交磋商,讨论台湾问题。 “台湾自古以来就是中国不可分割的一部分,99%的中国人民都支
    Thumbnail
    本文是詳細介紹兩位卡內基國際和平基金會的資深研究員在智庫外交關係協會刊物《外交事務》雙月刊上所發表文章的政策建議。重點是提醒台灣和美國的決策者,不要把重點只放在中共可能在2027年前後發動武力犯台,可能性更高的是中共以各種”灰色戰爭”的手段逐步蠶食台灣對自身空海域和對外經濟連結的控制以掌握台灣
    The implementation of the China-Russia cooperation must be that the weaker party provides the stronger party with ....
    Thumbnail
    3月20日在美國眾議院有一場重要的聽證會:眾院軍事委員會邀請印太司令部
    Thumbnail
    日本首相岸田文雄預定於4月10日以國賓的身份受邀前往美國拜訪,這是自9年前安倍以來,再度有日本首相受到國賓身份邀請前往美國訪問。
    中國在金廈的行為只是其在西太平洋與南海相同行為的一環,它有更大且非做不可的急迫性。
    Thumbnail
    2021/3/1 五眼聯盟可能對川普的《架構》早有所悉。莫理森採取與日、韓、東協「避險」不同的制衡策略,在聯盟中率先斷鏈脫勾,可能就是一種「試行、示範」。臺灣冷靜體認,澳洲對華政策仍必須取決於中美關係,而且短期內沒有找到取代中國買家的可能。中澳不僅有自貿協定,也有RCEP斡旋,未必以決裂相始終。
    「戰爭中沒有贏家或輸家,」山下說。「剩下的只是被摧毀的土地和對人民的傷害,就像我們今天在烏克蘭和以色列看到的那樣。需要避免台灣陷入緊急狀態。」
    Thumbnail
    2023/12/21 大陸外長王毅將這局低盪稱為舊金山願景,怕是過於浪漫...越南今年5月也與共軍海警發生過水砲衝突,拜登10月訪越大陣仗升級兩國「全面戰略夥伴」。但從習近平兩個月後緊接著訪越,締結「命運共同體」(越方譯為「共享未來共同體」),顯然越共有更多左右逢源的技巧(「竹子外交」)。
    Thumbnail
    當前「美日」、「美韓」、「美菲」都是軍事同盟國家,除分別簽署有「共同防禦條約」外,日本、南韓、菲律賓等國家,也皆有美國的軍事基地存在。台灣與美國雖無軍事同盟,但在近年來台美軍事合作的密集互動下,其實已發展出「準軍事同盟」的深層關係。
    Thumbnail
    《红色警戒之台湾之战》(4)                         美军篇章……承诺 开战前24小时。 瑞士日内瓦。 中国外交部部长王毅和美国国务卿布林肯在瑞士日内瓦见了面,面对面的外交磋商,讨论台湾问题。 “台湾自古以来就是中国不可分割的一部分,99%的中国人民都支
    Thumbnail
    本文是詳細介紹兩位卡內基國際和平基金會的資深研究員在智庫外交關係協會刊物《外交事務》雙月刊上所發表文章的政策建議。重點是提醒台灣和美國的決策者,不要把重點只放在中共可能在2027年前後發動武力犯台,可能性更高的是中共以各種”灰色戰爭”的手段逐步蠶食台灣對自身空海域和對外經濟連結的控制以掌握台灣
    The implementation of the China-Russia cooperation must be that the weaker party provides the stronger party with ....
    Thumbnail
    3月20日在美國眾議院有一場重要的聽證會:眾院軍事委員會邀請印太司令部
    Thumbnail
    日本首相岸田文雄預定於4月10日以國賓的身份受邀前往美國拜訪,這是自9年前安倍以來,再度有日本首相受到國賓身份邀請前往美國訪問。
    中國在金廈的行為只是其在西太平洋與南海相同行為的一環,它有更大且非做不可的急迫性。
    Thumbnail
    2021/3/1 五眼聯盟可能對川普的《架構》早有所悉。莫理森採取與日、韓、東協「避險」不同的制衡策略,在聯盟中率先斷鏈脫勾,可能就是一種「試行、示範」。臺灣冷靜體認,澳洲對華政策仍必須取決於中美關係,而且短期內沒有找到取代中國買家的可能。中澳不僅有自貿協定,也有RCEP斡旋,未必以決裂相始終。
    「戰爭中沒有贏家或輸家,」山下說。「剩下的只是被摧毀的土地和對人民的傷害,就像我們今天在烏克蘭和以色列看到的那樣。需要避免台灣陷入緊急狀態。」
    Thumbnail
    2023/12/21 大陸外長王毅將這局低盪稱為舊金山願景,怕是過於浪漫...越南今年5月也與共軍海警發生過水砲衝突,拜登10月訪越大陣仗升級兩國「全面戰略夥伴」。但從習近平兩個月後緊接著訪越,締結「命運共同體」(越方譯為「共享未來共同體」),顯然越共有更多左右逢源的技巧(「竹子外交」)。
    Thumbnail
    當前「美日」、「美韓」、「美菲」都是軍事同盟國家,除分別簽署有「共同防禦條約」外,日本、南韓、菲律賓等國家,也皆有美國的軍事基地存在。台灣與美國雖無軍事同盟,但在近年來台美軍事合作的密集互動下,其實已發展出「準軍事同盟」的深層關係。