Ukraine and Taiwan’s Fates Are Not Predetermined

更新於 發佈於 閱讀時間約 24 分鐘

This article was co-authored by Kuan-Ting Chen and Huynh Tam Sang (黃心光), a lecturer at Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities’ Faculty of International Relations, a research fellow at the Taiwan NextGen Foundation, and a non-resident WSD-Handa Fellow at Pacific Forum.


Pundits have claimed that China could take advantage of the Ukraine crisis to launch a military assault on Taiwan. But considerations of the security landscape, pragmatic commitments of the US, and the trajectory of countries getting involved in worrisome hotspots prove that this analogy is far from convincing.

As tensions between the West and Russia are mounting, China is watching Washington’s response to the Ukraine crisis closely. Some international relations analysts and commentators also consider this security impasse a proxy for Beijing’s aggressive actions against Taiwan, not excluding launching military attacks against the island. However, this analogy is misleading as it failed to comprehensively look into the nature of security in Ukraine and the Taiwan Strait.

There are fundamental differences with regard to Ukraine’s and Taiwan’s security. Russia’s massive military build-up along Ukraine’s borders has raised concerns among the West, leaving the crisis on the verge of brinkmanship. While Moscow’s possibility of launching a full-scale invasion should not be undermined, the security in the Taiwan Strait is far from moving towards a dramatic acceleration of military actions conducted by China against Taiwan.

China may capitalize on the ongoing crisis in Europe to step up its aerial incursions into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ). However, for an invasion to occur, it is not the priority of China at this juncture, especially when it had been focused on the Winter Olympics. At this point, Chinese President Xi Jinping is also prioritizing stability, which “is needed to pull off a smooth party congress.” China would have much to lose if a crisis were to happen at this critical time. The threat of a quick invasion from China is on the table, but not to a greater extent than what is happening in Ukraine.

The US commitment to the Indo-Pacific and Taiwan

Even in the midst of conflict in Ukraine, the US has sought to solidify its commitments with Indo-Pacific partners. To be more concrete, Washington has stepped up its political capital in the region. As the Ukraine crisis simmers, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken met his three counterparts from Japan, Australia, and India this February to forge cooperation among Indo-Pacific liberal democracies. Foreign ministers of Quad countries share the common notion that China is a growing coercive power, and they must join hands to counter China’s regional assertiveness effectively.

In a joint statement on the US-Japan-Republic of Korea trilateral ministerial meeting released on February 12, the three allies underscored “the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait”. In essence, Washington’s efforts to bring Taiwan into multilateral discussions aimed to deter Beijing’s adventurous actions against Taiwan and strengthen the post-Cold War rules-based order in the Asia-Pacific.

Additionally, the Biden administration’s long-promised Indo-Pacific Strategy released this month underscored Washington’s determination to support Taiwan, stating the US would enhance ties with both inside and outside partners in the Indo-Pacific region “to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, including by supporting Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities, to ensure an environment in which Taiwan’s future is determined peacefully in accordance with the wishes and best interests of Taiwan’s people.” Biden’s vow has been in line with American support for Taiwan, including its recent approval of a possible US$100 million sale of equipment and services to the island amid Beijing’s continuation of military provocations.

How Europe and the Indo-Pacific differs

In the European continent, there are concerns about differences with regard to strategies utilized to deter Russia among the US and its NATO allies. The three European leading powers Germany, Britain, and France “are pursuing sharply divergent approaches while also confronting domestic political distractions,” and there is virtually no consensus among NATO and European officials on “what measures to take in the event of an attack on Ukraine.” Washington’s strategic approach lies in diplomacy and deterrence in hope of keeping the crisis under the threshold of a full-scale war. The US has further decided to withdraw about 150 US military trainers of the Florida National Guard stationed in western Ukraine and threatened to impose harsh economic penalties should Russia invade Ukraine.

In contrast, in the Indo-Pacific like-minded powers are heading towards a shared vision of a prosperous and secure region characterized by non-coercion and a rules-based approach embraced to solve differences and disagreements. The need to support Taiwan has been shared among the Quad partners, comprising the US, Japan, Australia, and India. Even European major powers like the United Kingdom, France, and Germany have underscored their long-term interest among concerns over the security in the Taiwan Strait, and called for the compliance of international law and peaceful measures when coming to issues concerning China-Taiwan relations.

As economic and political gravity has shifted to the Indo-Pacific region, the “EU Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific,” released in April 2021, underlined that increasing tensions in the Taiwan Strait “may have a direct impact on European security and prosperity.” The important role of Taiwan’s semiconductors has been recognized among European countries, and for that reason, the EU would “pursue its deep trade investment relationships with whom it does not have trade and investment relations, such as Taiwan”. Intertwined interests between Taiwan and those countries, including ensuring the freedom of navigation and maintaining the status quo in the Taiwan Strait, would likely produce a pragmatic thrust that pushes European countries’ support for Taiwan.

China has no legitimacy to attack Taiwan

The reason for launching a war is of utmost importance when comparing the cases of Ukraine and Taiwan. Russia has long expressed its discontent for NATO’s expansion of military presence near Russia’s and warned actions to facilitate the participation of Ukraine as a new member of NATO would draw Western countries into a military conflict with Russia. This crisis has fallen into disarray when Sergii Nykyforov, a spokesman for Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, affirmed that the country’s desire to join NATO and the European Union remains an absolute priority.

To foster its strategic autonomy, Taiwan has been forging economic ties with the US, and regional middle powers, such as Japan, Australia, and India, while eying ties with Central and Eastern Europe countries, especially on trade and economic issues. But President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has made clear that Taiwan opposes unification but will not attempt to pursue formal changes to the status quo, China does not have a legitimate reason to kick off an invasion against Taiwan. Though the cross-Strait relations have been tense, the incumbent Taiwanese government has been astute in not seeking to provoke China by declaring “formal independence”.

The alignment between Taiwan and like-minded countries has helped enhance Taiwan’s political status and made it less certain for China to invade Taiwan without facing severe costs. The key factor for Taiwan’s security is the degree of engagement from the US. In coping with contingencies in the Taiwan Strait, America has cemented its partnership with Quad countries and supported Taiwan via deepening ties on both economic and military domains.

But as Washington could not afford to spread its military on both European and Asian fronts, the wise choice would be to focus on the Indo-Pacific. And this is what the US has been doing under the Trump and Biden administration. As pointed out by Henry Kissinger Distinguished Professor Hal Brands, one reason the Biden Administration “has explicitly rejected the possibility of defending Ukraine militarily” is to focus more on China. But Washington should work harder to successfully have South Korea on board with America’s commitment to supporting Taiwan, especially when the ROK might “stay out of any Taiwan scuffle,” said Sean King, senior vice president of the Park Strategies political consultancy based in New York.

So far, the possibility of China taking advantage of the Ukraine crisis to attack Taiwan is not likely. When coming to considerations like the security landscape, pragmatic commitments of the US, and the trajectory of countries getting involved in worrisome hotspots, Taiwan is currently in a safer mode compared with Ukraine. The US may not respond militarily to an invasion of Ukraine. However, strategic calculations could likely prompt Washington’s embrace of military measures when coming to the Taiwan Strait. And Chinese leaders must be wise enough to separate the US’s response to the Ukraine crisis and Washington’s interests and military capability in Asia.

留言
avatar-img
留言分享你的想法!
avatar-img
陳冠廷 Kuan-Ting Chen的沙龍
101會員
88內容數
<p>和我一起,從全世界的公共議題中發現共通問題,運用大格局,找到正確的解方。</p>
2022/10/14
台灣以自由、民主與人權揚名海外,這是台灣立國之本,也是台灣人民生活的方式,我們當然對此引以為傲,但除了理念相近的國家之外,我們也須思考其他拓展台灣國際生存空間的可能性。
Thumbnail
2022/10/14
台灣以自由、民主與人權揚名海外,這是台灣立國之本,也是台灣人民生活的方式,我們當然對此引以為傲,但除了理念相近的國家之外,我們也須思考其他拓展台灣國際生存空間的可能性。
Thumbnail
2022/01/27
In January, the foreign and defense ministers of the US and Japan met virtually to discuss closer defense ties. The virtual meeting was in the spotlig
Thumbnail
2022/01/27
In January, the foreign and defense ministers of the US and Japan met virtually to discuss closer defense ties. The virtual meeting was in the spotlig
Thumbnail
2021/03/18
距離上次捷克議長韋德齊訪臺至今不到一年,我們又驚見歷史的鬧劇,再次重演。
Thumbnail
2021/03/18
距離上次捷克議長韋德齊訪臺至今不到一年,我們又驚見歷史的鬧劇,再次重演。
Thumbnail
看更多
你可能也想看
Thumbnail
每年4月、5月都是最多稅要繳的月份,當然大部份的人都是有機會繳到「綜合所得稅」,只是相當相當多人還不知道,原來繳給政府的稅!可以透過一些有活動的銀行信用卡或電子支付來繳,從繳費中賺一點點小確幸!就是賺個1%~2%大家也是很開心的,因為你們把沒回饋變成有回饋,就是用卡的最高境界 所得稅線上申報
Thumbnail
每年4月、5月都是最多稅要繳的月份,當然大部份的人都是有機會繳到「綜合所得稅」,只是相當相當多人還不知道,原來繳給政府的稅!可以透過一些有活動的銀行信用卡或電子支付來繳,從繳費中賺一點點小確幸!就是賺個1%~2%大家也是很開心的,因為你們把沒回饋變成有回饋,就是用卡的最高境界 所得稅線上申報
Thumbnail
全球科技產業的焦點,AKA 全村的希望 NVIDIA,於五月底正式發布了他們在今年 2025 第一季的財報 (輝達內部財務年度為 2026 Q1,實際日曆期間為今年二到四月),交出了打敗了市場預期的成績單。然而,在銷售持續高速成長的同時,川普政府加大對於中國的晶片管制......
Thumbnail
全球科技產業的焦點,AKA 全村的希望 NVIDIA,於五月底正式發布了他們在今年 2025 第一季的財報 (輝達內部財務年度為 2026 Q1,實際日曆期間為今年二到四月),交出了打敗了市場預期的成績單。然而,在銷售持續高速成長的同時,川普政府加大對於中國的晶片管制......
Thumbnail
"即使臺灣海峽發生衝突,也要讓北韓不能冒險草率行動" "臺灣海峽危機將對韓半島產生嚴重的政治和經濟影響"
Thumbnail
"即使臺灣海峽發生衝突,也要讓北韓不能冒險草率行動" "臺灣海峽危機將對韓半島產生嚴重的政治和經濟影響"
Thumbnail
相對於一月美國智庫CSIS發表廣受矚目的詳細但難度頗高的兵推報告,本期《經濟學人》以一篇引言和一篇長篇專題具體描述戰前、開戰後的各種細節 走訪現役印太與華府美軍將領來幫助讀者想像戰爭爆發前後的各種狀況與可能的結果。不光讓讀者了解戰爭可能會如何進行與可能的結果,最大目標還是希望找出能防止戰爭爆發的良方
Thumbnail
相對於一月美國智庫CSIS發表廣受矚目的詳細但難度頗高的兵推報告,本期《經濟學人》以一篇引言和一篇長篇專題具體描述戰前、開戰後的各種細節 走訪現役印太與華府美軍將領來幫助讀者想像戰爭爆發前後的各種狀況與可能的結果。不光讓讀者了解戰爭可能會如何進行與可能的結果,最大目標還是希望找出能防止戰爭爆發的良方
Thumbnail
世界上目前戰爭動盪的主要因素盤點,瞭解情況以後,才能提前用最樂觀積極的心情,來做最壞的打算。
Thumbnail
世界上目前戰爭動盪的主要因素盤點,瞭解情況以後,才能提前用最樂觀積極的心情,來做最壞的打算。
Thumbnail
本篇先從中共是否有能力進犯臺灣,與可能會使用何種方式進犯臺灣,而臺灣國防目前碰到的問題,例如預算不足、戰略過於糢糊等,其實我們無法百分之一百面對中共的進犯,但正如上駟對下駟的問題一樣,只要我們投注資源在正確的地方,便可以已之長打敵之短,建立對方不敢進犯的威嚇能力
Thumbnail
本篇先從中共是否有能力進犯臺灣,與可能會使用何種方式進犯臺灣,而臺灣國防目前碰到的問題,例如預算不足、戰略過於糢糊等,其實我們無法百分之一百面對中共的進犯,但正如上駟對下駟的問題一樣,只要我們投注資源在正確的地方,便可以已之長打敵之短,建立對方不敢進犯的威嚇能力
Thumbnail
作者:陳華夫 台海情勢的穩定40年來都建立在微妙的「美中台三角威懾」上,但裴洛西訪台後,各方面官方或民間的有心人士開始朝著戰爭販子希望的方向拆解,但維持台海現狀符合美中台的利益,「美中台三角威懾」的定海神針仍完好如初。
Thumbnail
作者:陳華夫 台海情勢的穩定40年來都建立在微妙的「美中台三角威懾」上,但裴洛西訪台後,各方面官方或民間的有心人士開始朝著戰爭販子希望的方向拆解,但維持台海現狀符合美中台的利益,「美中台三角威懾」的定海神針仍完好如初。
Thumbnail
是說中國藉美國眾議院議長裴洛西訪台的機會,趁機打破海峽中線,不斷派遣戰機越界侵擾,進一步壓縮台灣的防禦空間與反應時間。美國雖然嚴厲指責中國的行為,卻未採取積極的行動。台灣為了避免提高緊張情勢,也選擇相對冷靜的方式來處理。結果就形成了,中國不斷步步進逼,美、台雙方卻難以有效反制的情況.......
Thumbnail
是說中國藉美國眾議院議長裴洛西訪台的機會,趁機打破海峽中線,不斷派遣戰機越界侵擾,進一步壓縮台灣的防禦空間與反應時間。美國雖然嚴厲指責中國的行為,卻未採取積極的行動。台灣為了避免提高緊張情勢,也選擇相對冷靜的方式來處理。結果就形成了,中國不斷步步進逼,美、台雙方卻難以有效反制的情況.......
Thumbnail
6月10日至12日,香格里拉對話(Shangri-La Dialogue)一連三日在新加坡舉行,台海問題與中美關係可謂貫穿全場。
Thumbnail
6月10日至12日,香格里拉對話(Shangri-La Dialogue)一連三日在新加坡舉行,台海問題與中美關係可謂貫穿全場。
Thumbnail
The US commitment to the Indo-Pacific and Taiwan How Europe and the Indo-Pacific differs China has no legitimacy to attack Taiwan
Thumbnail
The US commitment to the Indo-Pacific and Taiwan How Europe and the Indo-Pacific differs China has no legitimacy to attack Taiwan
Thumbnail
In January, the foreign and defense ministers of the US and Japan met virtually to discuss closer defense ties. The virtual meeting was in the spotlig
Thumbnail
In January, the foreign and defense ministers of the US and Japan met virtually to discuss closer defense ties. The virtual meeting was in the spotlig
Thumbnail
是說近來有一個非常甚囂塵上的的說法,認為美、中關係快速全面惡化,可能會讓台灣陷入戰爭危機中。這樣的說法雖然也不是毫無根據,畢竟中國共產黨政府在陷入國內危機時,慣於對外發動戰爭來轉移社會焦點。而毀棄一國兩制的承諾,對香港施重手,強推港版國安法的情況也還歷歷在目。認為中國會在這場危機中挺而走險....
Thumbnail
是說近來有一個非常甚囂塵上的的說法,認為美、中關係快速全面惡化,可能會讓台灣陷入戰爭危機中。這樣的說法雖然也不是毫無根據,畢竟中國共產黨政府在陷入國內危機時,慣於對外發動戰爭來轉移社會焦點。而毀棄一國兩制的承諾,對香港施重手,強推港版國安法的情況也還歷歷在目。認為中國會在這場危機中挺而走險....
追蹤感興趣的內容從 Google News 追蹤更多 vocus 的最新精選內容追蹤 Google News