Does the death penalty only deter rational people?

更新 發佈閱讀 8 分鐘

Published in Delaware State News 2018/01/13 https://baytobaynews.com/subscribe-today


Title: Does the death penalty deter crime?

Author: Hsin-Wen Lee (Department of Philosophy, University of Delaware)

Human beings fear death. If we receive the death penalty for murdering innocent people, we won’t do it because we don’t want to die. Thus, the death penalty deters us from killing, plain and simple.

This seems like common sense, doesn’t it? Then why do some abolitionists claim that the death penalty does not deter crime?

I also have some reservation about the deterrent effect of the death penalty. To be clear, the death penalty, just like all forms of punishment, may have some deterrent effect. However, that effect is more limited than is commonly believed.

Typically, when someone claims the death penalty deters crime, they implicitly make two assumptions: first, that the potential offender is a rational agent capable of considering the consequences of their actions, and second, the offender fears a particular type of consequence, namely, death. Also, the claim doesn't consider the offender's level of confidence that they won't be caught.

No fear of death

Some people don't fear death--this may be due to mental illness, false beliefs, or distorted values. For instance, Adam might believe that God sent him to kill Bill, and after fulfilling his sacred duty, he will ascend to heaven. Adam will not be deterred by the death penalty from killing Bill. Death is not a bad consequence for Adam if he ends up in heaven.

Or, John might think that if he becomes a serial killer, then he will be feared by society and will receive all the media attention. That makes him Übermensch. It is a distinction he is willing to pursue at the cost of his own life.

One thing worth noting: if a person has already received the death penalty, then no additional punishment is likely to deter her from committing more crime. She’s going to die anyway. The consequence can't be worse. 

No concern for consequences

Most of us are able to think rationally most of the time. However, there are times when we become possessed by strong emotions and lose our capacity to think rationally, perhaps only temporarily. For instance, there are times when people find out that a loved one was unjustly hurt or that they were betrayed by someone close to them. It is not unusual for people to become overpowered by fear or anger and lose the capacity to consider the consequences. Under those circumstances, people do not care about the consequences, so they likely won't be deterred by any penalty.

Catch me if you can

Sometimes even rational people who fear death won't be deterred by the death penalty. This is because they are confident that they won't be caught. For instance, Steven is confident about his plan for a perfect murder, and Ted knows all the loopholes in the criminal justice system. Neither Steven nor Ted will be deterred by the death penalty.

I believe my analysis shows that the death penalty has a more limited deterrent effect than is commonly believed. It deters only good people like you and me--rational human beings who value life and fear death. However, it does not deter those who should be our real concern in criminal deterrence. Abolitionists might be right.

留言
avatar-img
留言分享你的想法!
avatar-img
Hsin-Wen Lee的沙龍
10會員
62內容數
目前有四大主題以及其它零星議題討論。四大主題為: 「卡陰記」、「性侵/性騷擾」、「美國槍枝管制」、「死刑」。另有「升等記」「被學生申訴記」。
Hsin-Wen Lee的沙龍的其他內容
2024/09/23
廢死不是像美國那樣,把死刑廢除、然後全部改成無期徒刑就好了,更需要北歐那樣,把「戒護」這樣的觀念、擴大至教化、矯正等。能夠確保社會安全、才能放心廢死。
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
廢死不是像美國那樣,把死刑廢除、然後全部改成無期徒刑就好了,更需要北歐那樣,把「戒護」這樣的觀念、擴大至教化、矯正等。能夠確保社會安全、才能放心廢死。
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
殺人的原因,和死刑存廢無關,主要還是對人命不夠尊重。今天不管死刑存廢,你我都不會去殺害無辜的人,因為我們懂得要尊重別人的生命與選擇,不應該勉強別人、或是把別人當成達成自已目標的工具或手段。因此,不管是要防止熟人殺人、隨機殺人,最根本、最重重要的一件事,還是是能尊重他人。
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
殺人的原因,和死刑存廢無關,主要還是對人命不夠尊重。今天不管死刑存廢,你我都不會去殺害無辜的人,因為我們懂得要尊重別人的生命與選擇,不應該勉強別人、或是把別人當成達成自已目標的工具或手段。因此,不管是要防止熟人殺人、隨機殺人,最根本、最重重要的一件事,還是是能尊重他人。
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
所謂刑罰對犯罪的遏阻作用 ,指的是潛在犯罪者考慮到,在犯罪行為被發現後,可能受到刑罰的處份,因此,在害怕刑罰的情況之下,放棄本來犯罪的計劃。這預設了: 1) 潛在的犯罪者是理性的,會考量行為的後果,再決定是否犯罪。2) 他/她們會害怕死亡。用這樣的邏輯去思考死刑的遏阻作用的話,我們可以得知…  
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
所謂刑罰對犯罪的遏阻作用 ,指的是潛在犯罪者考慮到,在犯罪行為被發現後,可能受到刑罰的處份,因此,在害怕刑罰的情況之下,放棄本來犯罪的計劃。這預設了: 1) 潛在的犯罪者是理性的,會考量行為的後果,再決定是否犯罪。2) 他/她們會害怕死亡。用這樣的邏輯去思考死刑的遏阻作用的話,我們可以得知…  
Thumbnail
看更多