Does the death penalty only deter rational people?

更新於 發佈於 閱讀時間約 8 分鐘

Published in Delaware State News 2018/01/13 https://baytobaynews.com/subscribe-today


Title: Does the death penalty deter crime?

Author: Hsin-Wen Lee (Department of Philosophy, University of Delaware)

Human beings fear death. If we receive the death penalty for murdering innocent people, we won’t do it because we don’t want to die. Thus, the death penalty deters us from killing, plain and simple.

This seems like common sense, doesn’t it? Then why do some abolitionists claim that the death penalty does not deter crime?

I also have some reservation about the deterrent effect of the death penalty. To be clear, the death penalty, just like all forms of punishment, may have some deterrent effect. However, that effect is more limited than is commonly believed.

Typically, when someone claims the death penalty deters crime, they implicitly make two assumptions: first, that the potential offender is a rational agent capable of considering the consequences of their actions, and second, the offender fears a particular type of consequence, namely, death. Also, the claim doesn't consider the offender's level of confidence that they won't be caught.

No fear of death

Some people don't fear death--this may be due to mental illness, false beliefs, or distorted values. For instance, Adam might believe that God sent him to kill Bill, and after fulfilling his sacred duty, he will ascend to heaven. Adam will not be deterred by the death penalty from killing Bill. Death is not a bad consequence for Adam if he ends up in heaven.

Or, John might think that if he becomes a serial killer, then he will be feared by society and will receive all the media attention. That makes him Übermensch. It is a distinction he is willing to pursue at the cost of his own life.

One thing worth noting: if a person has already received the death penalty, then no additional punishment is likely to deter her from committing more crime. She’s going to die anyway. The consequence can't be worse. 

No concern for consequences

Most of us are able to think rationally most of the time. However, there are times when we become possessed by strong emotions and lose our capacity to think rationally, perhaps only temporarily. For instance, there are times when people find out that a loved one was unjustly hurt or that they were betrayed by someone close to them. It is not unusual for people to become overpowered by fear or anger and lose the capacity to consider the consequences. Under those circumstances, people do not care about the consequences, so they likely won't be deterred by any penalty.

Catch me if you can

Sometimes even rational people who fear death won't be deterred by the death penalty. This is because they are confident that they won't be caught. For instance, Steven is confident about his plan for a perfect murder, and Ted knows all the loopholes in the criminal justice system. Neither Steven nor Ted will be deterred by the death penalty.

I believe my analysis shows that the death penalty has a more limited deterrent effect than is commonly believed. It deters only good people like you and me--rational human beings who value life and fear death. However, it does not deter those who should be our real concern in criminal deterrence. Abolitionists might be right.

留言
avatar-img
留言分享你的想法!
avatar-img
Hsin-Wen Lee的沙龍
10會員
60內容數
目前有四大主題以及其它零星議題討論。四大主題為: 「卡陰記」、「性侵/性騷擾」、「美國槍枝管制」、「死刑」。另有「升等記」「被學生申訴記」。
Hsin-Wen Lee的沙龍的其他內容
2024/09/23
廢死不是像美國那樣,把死刑廢除、然後全部改成無期徒刑就好了,更需要北歐那樣,把「戒護」這樣的觀念、擴大至教化、矯正等。能夠確保社會安全、才能放心廢死。
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
廢死不是像美國那樣,把死刑廢除、然後全部改成無期徒刑就好了,更需要北歐那樣,把「戒護」這樣的觀念、擴大至教化、矯正等。能夠確保社會安全、才能放心廢死。
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
殺人的原因,和死刑存廢無關,主要還是對人命不夠尊重。今天不管死刑存廢,你我都不會去殺害無辜的人,因為我們懂得要尊重別人的生命與選擇,不應該勉強別人、或是把別人當成達成自已目標的工具或手段。因此,不管是要防止熟人殺人、隨機殺人,最根本、最重重要的一件事,還是是能尊重他人。
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
殺人的原因,和死刑存廢無關,主要還是對人命不夠尊重。今天不管死刑存廢,你我都不會去殺害無辜的人,因為我們懂得要尊重別人的生命與選擇,不應該勉強別人、或是把別人當成達成自已目標的工具或手段。因此,不管是要防止熟人殺人、隨機殺人,最根本、最重重要的一件事,還是是能尊重他人。
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
所謂刑罰對犯罪的遏阻作用 ,指的是潛在犯罪者考慮到,在犯罪行為被發現後,可能受到刑罰的處份,因此,在害怕刑罰的情況之下,放棄本來犯罪的計劃。這預設了: 1) 潛在的犯罪者是理性的,會考量行為的後果,再決定是否犯罪。2) 他/她們會害怕死亡。用這樣的邏輯去思考死刑的遏阻作用的話,我們可以得知…  
Thumbnail
2024/09/23
所謂刑罰對犯罪的遏阻作用 ,指的是潛在犯罪者考慮到,在犯罪行為被發現後,可能受到刑罰的處份,因此,在害怕刑罰的情況之下,放棄本來犯罪的計劃。這預設了: 1) 潛在的犯罪者是理性的,會考量行為的後果,再決定是否犯罪。2) 他/她們會害怕死亡。用這樣的邏輯去思考死刑的遏阻作用的話,我們可以得知…  
Thumbnail
看更多
你可能也想看
Thumbnail
TOMICA第一波推出吉伊卡哇聯名小車車的時候馬上就被搶購一空,一直很扼腕當時沒有趕緊入手。前陣子閒來無事逛蝦皮,突然發現幾家商場都又開始重新上架,價格也都回到正常水準,估計是官方又再補了一批貨,想都沒想就立刻下單! 同文也跟大家分享近期蝦皮購物紀錄、好用推薦、蝦皮分潤計畫的聯盟行銷!
Thumbnail
TOMICA第一波推出吉伊卡哇聯名小車車的時候馬上就被搶購一空,一直很扼腕當時沒有趕緊入手。前陣子閒來無事逛蝦皮,突然發現幾家商場都又開始重新上架,價格也都回到正常水準,估計是官方又再補了一批貨,想都沒想就立刻下單! 同文也跟大家分享近期蝦皮購物紀錄、好用推薦、蝦皮分潤計畫的聯盟行銷!
Thumbnail
每年4月、5月都是最多稅要繳的月份,當然大部份的人都是有機會繳到「綜合所得稅」,只是相當相當多人還不知道,原來繳給政府的稅!可以透過一些有活動的銀行信用卡或電子支付來繳,從繳費中賺一點點小確幸!就是賺個1%~2%大家也是很開心的,因為你們把沒回饋變成有回饋,就是用卡的最高境界 所得稅線上申報
Thumbnail
每年4月、5月都是最多稅要繳的月份,當然大部份的人都是有機會繳到「綜合所得稅」,只是相當相當多人還不知道,原來繳給政府的稅!可以透過一些有活動的銀行信用卡或電子支付來繳,從繳費中賺一點點小確幸!就是賺個1%~2%大家也是很開心的,因為你們把沒回饋變成有回饋,就是用卡的最高境界 所得稅線上申報
Thumbnail
看不見的未知,固然值得恐懼,但其實能看見弱肉強食的真理,只為促進文明發展加速而存在,而我們昇華恐懼,妥善運用弱肉強食存在的真理,在下限,因恐懼著暴力而遠離野蠻;在上限,因害怕著看不見美好願景而遠離盲目,隨時更積極而更文明。
Thumbnail
看不見的未知,固然值得恐懼,但其實能看見弱肉強食的真理,只為促進文明發展加速而存在,而我們昇華恐懼,妥善運用弱肉強食存在的真理,在下限,因恐懼著暴力而遠離野蠻;在上限,因害怕著看不見美好願景而遠離盲目,隨時更積極而更文明。
Thumbnail
本文探討了人類思想與美德之間的關聯性,認為只要人類思想具有美德,就不會成為貪婪的奴隸。同時指出人類若主動選擇貪婪與腐敗為伴,將面臨上帝的公正懲罰。
Thumbnail
本文探討了人類思想與美德之間的關聯性,認為只要人類思想具有美德,就不會成為貪婪的奴隸。同時指出人類若主動選擇貪婪與腐敗為伴,將面臨上帝的公正懲罰。
Thumbnail
「善有善報、惡有惡報」是真的嗎?本文旨在回答這個問題-破除「善惡因果律 (或稱道德因果律)」的迷思,分析其心理、情感、信仰的基礎,並指出「德福一致」在社會實踐的幾個可能方向。
Thumbnail
「善有善報、惡有惡報」是真的嗎?本文旨在回答這個問題-破除「善惡因果律 (或稱道德因果律)」的迷思,分析其心理、情感、信仰的基礎,並指出「德福一致」在社會實踐的幾個可能方向。
Thumbnail
人心與太陽一樣,都是需要小心對待的存在。這篇文章談論瞭如何在這個充滿善惡的世界中保護自己,並對人性的邪惡進行了探討。
Thumbnail
人心與太陽一樣,都是需要小心對待的存在。這篇文章談論瞭如何在這個充滿善惡的世界中保護自己,並對人性的邪惡進行了探討。
Thumbnail
作者岡本茂樹說,如果你認為「懂事」、「體貼」、「堅強勇敢」、「獨立自主」就是「好孩子」的樣貌,那麼你就該擔心這孩子將有很高的機率會成為罪犯!
Thumbnail
作者岡本茂樹說,如果你認為「懂事」、「體貼」、「堅強勇敢」、「獨立自主」就是「好孩子」的樣貌,那麼你就該擔心這孩子將有很高的機率會成為罪犯!
Thumbnail
「強迫」沒錯。只是看是目的和方式取決強迫的必要性!
Thumbnail
「強迫」沒錯。只是看是目的和方式取決強迫的必要性!
追蹤感興趣的內容從 Google News 追蹤更多 vocus 的最新精選內容追蹤 Google News