槍枝管制

更新於 發佈於 閱讀時間約 9 分鐘
All people should have the right to own a gun to protect themselves. should laws be changed to facilitate this?

According to BBC News on 24th March 2021, President Joe Biden has vowed to take “common-sense steps” to crack down on firearms following two mass shootings in the U.S. in less than a week. Yet, many conservatives, including the Republicans, are averse to Mr. Biden’s strict gun control measures and they hold the right to own a gun which is protected by the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. I feel the question is controversial whether laws should be modified. I will now look at these issues in more detail.

Guns have been invented as a historical weapon since the ancient times. In general, people consider guns as means of protection not only for military use, but also for hunting, sports, and self-defense from foreign invaders, especially for those in the United States. In respect of the U.S. being the world’s third or fourth the largest country by total area, owning a gun brings a sense of safety from invasions of wild animals and criminals. Furthermore, the U.S. society has been known as an immigrant’s paradise which comprises of various races. The diverse population forms an energetic living environment, but meanwhile, caused enormous amounts of conflicts related to racial discrimination issues. Many argue that police officers have excessive authority power to assert the security. As a result of this, people have a tendency to perceive firearms as a symbol of power. Therefore, some point out that stronger gun laws are ineffective. Conversely, people would turn to the black market to purchase guns which are indispensable for reprisal. This stricter gun control will eventually have no impact on crime rates decreasing.

Due to the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, it is very difficult for the Biden’s government to nullify stronger gun control law. Yet, based on a selection of charts from BBC news on 8th April 2021, the small arms survey of 2018 divulged the estimation of firearms owned per 100 residents. The U.S. was ranked the top country by 120.5 civilians owning a gun. Another chart illustrates that the gun-related homicides accounted for 73% of all homicides in the U.S. in 2019. Hence, it is vital to understand that gun seems not a mean of protection but a killing tool. In addition, within the past ten years, mass shootings have been another serious problem in accordance with increasing number of victims killed. Some people argue that civilians owing firearms are not able to eliminate crime, but causes more dangerous situations, including deadly mass shootings, homicides, and accidental gun deaths.

In conclusion, I am personally inclined with taking steps to strictly regulate ownership of assault weapons. I believe that some measures can be taken into practice, such as licenses of ownership and real name registration system. However, it seems to me the question is not only related to law and order, but also social consensus towards law enforcement, especially for the police systemofpower abuses. Take the tragic death of George Floyd, the cost to society was great. It triggered ‘Black Live Matter’ movement. Furthermore, the Americans lost their trust and belief of their justice systems. In my opinion, it is more critical to develop a genuine relationship between the police systems and general public. While people would not consider firearms as a symbol of power and have confidence of their justice systems for protection, strict law amendment of gun control could be widely acknowledged.

留言
avatar-img
留言分享你的想法!
avatar-img
petitechi 小琦宇宙的沙龍
5會員
31內容數
英文寫作練習,透過不同主題設定,運用英文思辨之能力,以增強英文寫作技巧。
2022/06/01
台灣職場近幾年有哪些變化?所帶來的影響為何?
Thumbnail
2022/06/01
台灣職場近幾年有哪些變化?所帶來的影響為何?
Thumbnail
2021/09/30
未來的教育樣貌會如何?哪些趨勢會影響並改變教育的發展模式?
Thumbnail
2021/09/30
未來的教育樣貌會如何?哪些趨勢會影響並改變教育的發展模式?
Thumbnail
2021/09/30
獲得亮眼成績的運動員,其實均擁有類似的人格特質。這些人格特質不只適用於運動場上,也值得一般人學習模仿,應用於人生中。
Thumbnail
2021/09/30
獲得亮眼成績的運動員,其實均擁有類似的人格特質。這些人格特質不只適用於運動場上,也值得一般人學習模仿,應用於人生中。
Thumbnail
看更多
你可能也想看
Thumbnail
「欸!這是在哪裡買的?求連結 🥺」 誰叫你太有品味,一發就讓大家跟著剁手手? 讓你回購再回購的生活好物,是時候該介紹出場了吧! 「開箱你的美好生活」現正召喚各路好物的開箱使者 🤩
Thumbnail
「欸!這是在哪裡買的?求連結 🥺」 誰叫你太有品味,一發就讓大家跟著剁手手? 讓你回購再回購的生活好物,是時候該介紹出場了吧! 「開箱你的美好生活」現正召喚各路好物的開箱使者 🤩
Thumbnail
談到軍事怎麼改,一般人的想法多是買武器,而且越大越好,似乎沒想過事情沒那麼簡單。 好比說,我們買了防空飛彈,一組兩台車,最低人力4個,所以一百組就是400人?當然不是啊,國軍一個愛國者三型飛彈連有8台車,一個連有100多人欸,怎麼可能全部去開車。
Thumbnail
談到軍事怎麼改,一般人的想法多是買武器,而且越大越好,似乎沒想過事情沒那麼簡單。 好比說,我們買了防空飛彈,一組兩台車,最低人力4個,所以一百組就是400人?當然不是啊,國軍一個愛國者三型飛彈連有8台車,一個連有100多人欸,怎麼可能全部去開車。
Thumbnail
從選舉、集會遊行、佔領行動到內戰,這些都屬於衝突管理的範疇。我不認為暴力是絕對不被允許的,只是不同程度的衝突會適用不同的正當化基礎還有管理規範。
Thumbnail
從選舉、集會遊行、佔領行動到內戰,這些都屬於衝突管理的範疇。我不認為暴力是絕對不被允許的,只是不同程度的衝突會適用不同的正當化基礎還有管理規範。
Thumbnail
是否法律應讓人民擁有槍械的自由?
Thumbnail
是否法律應讓人民擁有槍械的自由?
Thumbnail
3月16日,佐治亞州首府亞特蘭大發生連環槍擊事件,造成包含6名亞裔在內的8人無辜喪命。而在此前幾月,全美境內針對亞裔的仇恨犯罪率便已持續上升。根據加州大學聖伯納迪諾分院仇恨與極端主義研究中心(CSUSB)數據顯示, 2020年美國整體仇恨犯罪率下降6%,但針對亞裔美國人的仇恨犯罪卻激增145%。
Thumbnail
3月16日,佐治亞州首府亞特蘭大發生連環槍擊事件,造成包含6名亞裔在內的8人無辜喪命。而在此前幾月,全美境內針對亞裔的仇恨犯罪率便已持續上升。根據加州大學聖伯納迪諾分院仇恨與極端主義研究中心(CSUSB)數據顯示, 2020年美國整體仇恨犯罪率下降6%,但針對亞裔美國人的仇恨犯罪卻激增145%。
Thumbnail
今天看新聞看到不太好的新聞,報道說有兩名參與示威的公民被軍隊用實彈射傷致死,甚至在社交平台上看到有一名的年輕男子被緬甸陣政府軍人用狙擊槍射至爆頭,死者頭皮直至飛脫,頭骨裂開當場死亡。現在有消息說十個地方武裝組織在此事後都一致同意不再與緬甸軍政府和平談判,向軍政府宣戰。內戰可能一觸即發,希望緬甸人民平
Thumbnail
今天看新聞看到不太好的新聞,報道說有兩名參與示威的公民被軍隊用實彈射傷致死,甚至在社交平台上看到有一名的年輕男子被緬甸陣政府軍人用狙擊槍射至爆頭,死者頭皮直至飛脫,頭骨裂開當場死亡。現在有消息說十個地方武裝組織在此事後都一致同意不再與緬甸軍政府和平談判,向軍政府宣戰。內戰可能一觸即發,希望緬甸人民平
Thumbnail
警方和示威者的互動一向是一門非常難以研究的課題,但至少過去半世紀的研究均指出,警方以更大程度的武力應對示威——例如從一開始便穿著防暴裝備或使用催淚彈——對緩和事態的作用很小,甚至往往適得其反。既然我們都知道這些都不管用,為甚麼催淚彈、橡膠子彈、布袋彈、防暴裝備等強硬的人群管制手法仍然在各地廣泛使用?
Thumbnail
警方和示威者的互動一向是一門非常難以研究的課題,但至少過去半世紀的研究均指出,警方以更大程度的武力應對示威——例如從一開始便穿著防暴裝備或使用催淚彈——對緩和事態的作用很小,甚至往往適得其反。既然我們都知道這些都不管用,為甚麼催淚彈、橡膠子彈、布袋彈、防暴裝備等強硬的人群管制手法仍然在各地廣泛使用?
Thumbnail
法治制度所實現的正義是回溯性的,即只有當犯罪行為發生後,才得以透過司法制度對犯罪人進行制裁。要打從根本處理警暴的問題,必須從警察的執法文化著手,而執法文化背後又反映著社會存在的問題。墮入惡性循環的警民衝突, 已可不能單靠追究個別警員重拾公眾信心。
Thumbnail
法治制度所實現的正義是回溯性的,即只有當犯罪行為發生後,才得以透過司法制度對犯罪人進行制裁。要打從根本處理警暴的問題,必須從警察的執法文化著手,而執法文化背後又反映著社會存在的問題。墮入惡性循環的警民衝突, 已可不能單靠追究個別警員重拾公眾信心。
追蹤感興趣的內容從 Google News 追蹤更多 vocus 的最新精選內容追蹤 Google News