雅思写作范文之雅思剑18写作范文及解析折线图The graph below shows the average ...
雅思写作范文之雅思剑18写作范文及解析
折线图
The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of threemetals during 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,andmake comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
這篇文章提供了一份雅思写作的高分范文示例，源自《雅思劍橋18》Test4的小作文題目，類型為折线图分析。
這篇范文不僅展示了如何有效地描述和分析圖表中的信息，還演示了如何組織寫作結構，從開頭的概述到具體月份的詳細變化，再到年終的總結。下面是對這篇范文結構和內容的進一步解析：
開頭段：改寫题目：將題目信息用不同的詞彙和結構進行改寫，以顯示對題目的理解。概述趋势：概括全年的主要趨勢，指出三種金属價格的顯著波動性。
主体段落：時序分析：按月份將資料分為不同階段，逐一描述。1-2月描述金屬價格的上漲。3-4月分析繼續上漲但速度放緩的趨勢。6-9月指出所有金屬價格的下跌。
具體数据：使用具體的百分比來描述價格變化，讓描述更加精確。結尾段：總結全年趨勢，特別是年末價格的反彈和上漲。
語言和表達：使用專業詞彙如“significant volatility”和“most considerable fluctuations”來描述市場變化。动词使用，如“dramatically rose”，“bounced back”，以及“marked a turnaround”，有效表達價格變動的程度和方向。
這篇范文不僅展示了對折线图的深入分析，還示範了如何使用專業的語言和結構清晰地表達思路。這對於準備雅思寫作考試的考生來說，是一個很好的學習資源。
You請撰寫一個6分範文ChatGPTChatGPT
題目：The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
範文：The provided line graph elucidates the average monthly variations in the prices of copper, nickel, and zinc throughout 2014. An analysis of the graph reveals distinct trends and fluctuations among these metals over the said period.Initially, in January, all three metals exhibited an upward trend in prices. Nickel showed the most dramatic increase at 6%, while copper and zinc experienced more modest rises of 2% and 1%, respectively.
This upward trend continued into February, with nickel prices again leading, marking a 4% increase, followed by lesser yet positive changes in the prices of copper and zinc.As the year progressed, from March to April, all metals maintained their ascending price trajectory, albeit at a slower pace, with zinc notably recording the highest increase.
However, in May, a notable shift occurred; copper’s price slightly declined by approximately 0.5%, whereas nickel and zinc sustained their gradual upward momentum.The period from June to September marked a significant downturn for all metals. Nickel was particularly affected, with a sharp 3% decline in June. Copper, on the other hand, managed to recover gradually, showing a steady 1% monthly increase from July onwards.
In contrast, zinc and nickel prices mostly trended downwards during these months.In the final quarter of the year, the graph shows a reversal of the previous declines. November was pivotal as all metals experienced price increases, with zinc leading at a 1.5% rise. This positive momentum extended into December, where zinc again topped the chart with a notable 2% increase, concluding the year on a high note.In summary, the graph portrays a year of significant volatility for the prices of copper, nickel, and zinc.
While all three metals showed fluctuations, nickel was the most volatile, and zinc, despite some declines, ended the year with the strongest recovery. Copper’s performance was relatively stable, with gradual recoveries after minor setbacks.
You請撰寫一個7分範文ChatGPTChatGPT
題目：The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
範文：The line graph delineates the average monthly price fluctuations of three metals - copper, nickel, and zinc - during the course of 2014. An inspection of the graph unveils the volatility inherent in the commodities market, with each metal displaying unique trends and patterns over the twelve-month period.
Commencing the year, January saw a notable ascent in the prices of all metals, with nickel surging by 6%, the highest across the trio, while copper and zinc prices increased by 2% and 1% respectively. This upward trajectory persisted into February, with nickel again at the forefront, exhibiting a 4% rise. Copper and zinc, although trailing, continued their modest upward journey.
The period from March to April represented a sustained growth, albeit at a diminished rate, across all metals, signifying a stabilizing market. Zinc, in particular, marked the largest increment during this phase. However, the trend took a slight detour in May, as copper’s price dipped by 0.5%, indicating the first sign of a downturn, whereas nickel and zinc managed to sustain their gradual ascension.
A pronounced decline was observable from June to September, with June being particularly detrimental for nickel, which plummeted by 3%. During this phase, copper’s price demonstrated resilience and gradual recovery, registering a consistent 1% monthly increase. In contrast, nickel and zinc experienced a general downward trend, though with less severity than the initial drop.
The concluding months, notably November and December, saw a market resurgence, with all metals registering price increases. Zinc, in particular, showcased significant recovery, with increments of 1.5% and 2% in November and December respectively, leading the charge in the market rebound.In conclusion, the graph provides a comprehensive overview of the price dynamics of copper, nickel, and zinc in 2014, highlighting the susceptibility of these metals to market fluctuations. Nickel emerged as the most volatile, while zinc closed the year with the strongest rebound. Copper, displaying relative stability, underscored the nuanced and unpredictable nature of the commodities market.
You請撰寫一個8分範文ChatGPTChatGPT
題目：The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
範文：The line graph presents a nuanced depiction of the monthly price dynamics of copper, nickel, and zinc throughout 2014, showcasing the fluctuations and trends that characterized their market behavior. A meticulous examination of the data reveals the intricate patterns and significant variability in the pricing of these metals, shedding light on their economic interplay and market sentiment.January initiated the observation period with an upward price momentum, wherein nickel led the ascent with a remarkable 6% increase, signaling a robust start to the year for this metal.
Copper and zinc, though trailing, also registered positive growth, with increments of 2% and 1% respectively. This phase of growth persisted into February, with all three metals extending their upward trajectory, epitomized by nickel’s 4% rise, which underscored its volatile market position.Transitioning into the spring months, the graph indicates a continuation of the growth trend, albeit at a moderated pace. This period was marked by zinc achieving the most substantial gain, illustrating a shift in market dynamics.
However, May introduced a slight reversal, particularly for copper, which experienced a marginal decline of 0.5%, while nickel and zinc managed to uphold a modest upward trend.The narrative of the graph took a turn from June to September, delineating a period of generalized decline. Nickel was particularly impacted, with a sharp 3% reduction in June, portraying its susceptibility to market corrections.
Copper, however, exhibited resilience and gradual recovery, evident from a consistent 1% monthly increment starting from July, in stark contrast to the prevailing downward trend in the prices of nickel and zinc.The year's final quarter marked a resurgence in the metal prices, with November witnessing a pivotal recovery across the board. Zinc, notably, led this rebound with a 1.5% increase, setting the stage for a strong year-end performance. This resurgence continued into December, with all metals experiencing price elevations, culminating in zinc’s impressive 2% rise, the highest recorded in this closing month.In synthesizing the data, the graph not only details the individual trajectories of copper, nickel, and zinc prices but also encapsulates the broader economic forces at play.
The analysis illustrates the metals' market as one of high volatility and complexity, with nickel exhibiting the most pronounced fluctuations, while zinc demonstrated significant resilience and recovery, concluding the year on a high note. Copper’s relatively steady performance throughout the year offered a counterpoint to the more dramatic shifts observed in the other metals, emphasizing the diverse investment and risk profiles inherent in the commodities market.
You請撰寫一個9分範文ChatGPTChatGPT
題目：The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
範文：The line graph meticulously charts the average monthly price fluctuations of copper, nickel, and zinc over the course of 2014, offering a compelling narrative of their market trajectories. This analysis unravels the complex interplay of factors governing the commodities market, as evidenced by the distinct price behaviors of these metals, each reflective of underlying economic conditions and investor sentiment.The year commenced with an optimistic surge in metal prices, particularly for nickel, which soared by an impressive 6% in January, marking the most substantial monthly increase among the metals.
Copper and zinc, albeit to a lesser extent, followed this upward trend with rises of 2% and 1% respectively, painting a picture of a buoyant market outset. February maintained this momentum, with nickel again leading the pack, evidencing a 4% climb, and signaling its heightened market volatility and speculative interest.The ensuing months from March to April illustrated a tempered yet steady price appreciation across the metals, with zinc notably outpacing its counterparts. This period was emblematic of a sustained yet cautious market optimism.
However, May heralded a nuanced shift in the pricing paradigm; copper's value slightly receded by 0.5%, introducing a ripple of market recalibration, while nickel and zinc persisted in their upward trajectory, albeit at a moderated pace.A pronounced reversal in market sentiment was captured between June and September, a timeframe characterized by a general price depreciation. Nickel, in particular, faced a stark 3% decrement in June, exposing its pronounced market sensitivity.
In contrast, copper displayed a remarkable resilience, embarking on a gradual recovery path, delineated by a consistent 1% monthly increase, defying the broader market downtrend and highlighting its relative market stability.The narrative arc culminated in the final quarter, where a marked rejuvenation in prices was observed. November was a turning point, with all three metals experiencing an upswing, led by zinc’s 1.5% elevation. This recovery phase extended into December, where zinc's price escalated by 2%, the most significant monthly increase within this period, thereby solidifying its position as the year’s strong performer.
In sum, the line graph transcends a mere statistical representation to encapsulate the volatile yet fascinating dynamics of the metal commodities market in 2014. It portrays nickel as the most volatile entity, zinc as the year’s stalwart in terms of recovery and growth, and copper as the epitome of steady market conduct. This detailed exposition not only reflects the economic vicissitudes but also underscores the strategic imperatives for market participants in navigating the complex landscape of commodity investments.
