有一個英文單字,在IELTS Writing Task 2具有兩大神奇的威力:
包括:
直接破題固然可以,但是背景提供作文主題一個存在的時空資訊,同時從描繪背景出發,到點破主題、再到引出寫作目的,這是一連串聚焦的過程,瞄準連貫性評分項目爭取分數。
背景絕對不能冗長,所謂不能冗長,半個句子就夠了。一個句子包含幾個單字、半句話又是幾個單字呢?當使用同一種策略來架構第一段數次,(有思考的)考生自然會領略到適當的篇幅。
習慣反覆抄寫所謂範文來練習雅思作文的考生,逐字記憶單字串聯成句子再模仿寫成的段落,缺少彈性,亦即難以適用於不同類型考題和主題。考官能輕易看出生硬套用的痕跡。建議改成這種方式:記憶架構整段的策略並實際演練多題(記得策略而非幾個漂亮單字和句子)。
如何用半個句子寫背景呢?更重要的問題應該是:如何用半句話描寫背景並且能和另外半句話有邏輯連貫呢?
原生文法上的邏輯連貫比語氣或語意上的連貫要保險許多,畢竟是英文語法規則產生的邏輯關係。能在文法上連接兩個子句形成一句話而且有主和次之分的,正是副詞連接詞(對等連接詞所連接的兩個子句是對等的)。
什麼是會思考的考生?
考生A必然有能力理解原理以後開始活用;反之,考生B很可能又把那個神奇單字當成模板了。
while有三個層次的涵義,引導時間子句、讓步子句、對照子句,意味著可將把副詞子句當成主要子句發生的時間同時主要子句和副詞子句之間有明顯的反差,襯托主要子句資訊的重要性。
Many people nowadays use distance-learning programs to study at home, but some people think that distance learning cannot bring the benefit as much as attending college or university.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
請看(範例一)
While the advent of distance-learning programs has revolutionized access to education, offering flexibility and convenience, I doubt if these programs can deliver the same quality of education as traditional campus-based education. (31 words)
Some people look forward to a year of traveling before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons. For others this is an expensive waste of time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
請看範例)二)
While many view embarking on a year-long journey before starting work or university as an invaluable opportunity for personal growth and cultural enrichment, others perceive it as a frivolous expenditure of time and resources. (34 words)
考生有沒有發現這一點?
一般人在沒有閱讀本文之前自學,看不懂英文除了查字典以外還能直接看中文翻譯,但很難靠自己推敲出為什麼要用while,即使很容易知道while的中文意思和文法上的使用方法。如此一來,可能淪落成記憶單字和句子,面對新的考題時,僅能設法更換幾個單字,也就是模仿有其深淺的差別,填鴨式背誦高分範文和表面臨摹範例就只能看熱鬧而無法看門道。
Some people believe that the promotion of museums and zoos wastes public funds as cities are facing more urgent problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While cities around the world grapple with pressing issues such as poverty and infrastructure, I contend that public money should not be devoted to museums and zoos.
當世界各地的城市都在努力解決貧困和基礎設施等緊迫問題時,我認為公共資金不應該專門用於博物館和動物園。