2024-05-04|閱讀時間 ‧ 約 30 分鐘

雅思大作文8分範文及解析：政府是否應為負擔不起的人提供免費住房

雅思大作文8分范文及解析：政府是否应为负担不起的人提供免费住房

2023.8.26雅思大作文8分范文及解析：政府是否应为负担不起的人提供免费住房

　　观点类大作文，社会类话题

　　As housing is a basic need for people, the government should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　题目来源：2023年8月26日大陆雅思大作文

　　题目大意

　　由于住房是人们的基本需求，政府应该为每个负担不起的人提供免费住房。你是否同意?

　　思路解析

　　这是一道观点类大作文，聊得是政府是否应该提供免费住房。审题时需要注意三点，一是题目句“As housing is a basic need for people”是背景句，不需要论证是否正确。二是题目讨论对象限定在“housing”上，无论同意与否，观点都需要围绕这个点展开。三是题目观点中包含词“everyone”，一般遇到化观点，持反对角度更容易写。下面，月半鸭和大家一起来看下具体观点。

　　首先来看赞同的角度，有两方面。

　　一方面可以保障基本人权和社会稳定。一个稳定的住所可以提供一个更加稳定的生活环境，从而有助于人们更好地融入社会、找到工作、照顾家庭，以及参与社区活动。

　　另一方面提高公共健康，没有稳定的住所会导致健康问题，包括心理健康和传染性疾病。给所有人通过提供干净的住房，可以降低公共健康风险。

　　再来看反对角度，有三点。

　　一是会带来巨大的财政负担。给所有人提供免费住房会对政府财政造成巨大压力，而政府为了应对财政费用不足，可能会增加税收或者减少其他社会福利。

　　二是会降低公民的积极度和公平问题。提供免费住房可能会降低个人寻找工作或提升收入的动力，从而增加长期依赖政府援助的风险。同时，那些刚好达不到资格标准的人可能会感到不公平，进而产生不满或者惰性。

　　三是破坏行业发展。政府提供免费住房可能会扭曲房地产市场，使相关从业者的利益受损，比如人们很少再有租房的实际需求，进而导致整体行业变得低效和资源浪费。

　　提纲

　　高分范文示例

　　Undeniably, shelter stands as a cornerstone of basic human requirements. Yet, I find myself in contention with the proposition that it is the government's role to proffer gratuitous housing to every individual incapable of independently footing the expense. My standpoint arises from apprehensions regarding feasibility, equity, and the potential for engendering a culture of dependency.

　　A primary concern that must be addressed is the colossal fiscal burden such a policy would exert on a nation's treasury. Governments are tasked with the complex role of judiciously allocating resources across an array of sectors, and the pledge to furnish gratuitous housing could precipitate a considerable deflection of capital from other critical domains, such as the realm of education or public healthcare.

　　A further apprehension lies in the unforeseen ramifications of such a policy, specifically its potential to stymie personal endeavour. The provision of gratuitous housing, whilst undoubtedly benevolent in intention, may inadvertently dissuade individuals from pursuing gainful employment or enhancing their fiscal circumstances. This could engender a culture of dependency that might prove detrimental in the broader perspective.

　　Moreover, the question of equity emerges. Delineating housing allocation based on fiscal need could engender situations wherein those marginally falling short of the eligibility criteria bear disproportionate financial duress, thereby birthing a fresh cadre of societal disparities. A more balanced approach may lie in the government formulating policies aimed at enhancing the affordability of housing. This could encompass strategies such as offering financial aid to prospective homeowners, instituting rent control measures, or incentivizing the creation of cost-effective housing units.

　　In conclusion, while the aim of guaranteeing universal access to housing is commendable, the dispensation of free housing to every individual incapable of affording it may not represent the most efficacious or equitable strategy. Instead, policies designed to bolster housing affordability could offer a more nuanced, sustainable resolution.

　　范文作者：Sophia

　　相关词汇和语法结构

　　In contention with 与...有争议

　　Apprehensions regarding 对...的忧虑

　　Colossal fiscal burden 巨大的财政负担

　　Judiciously allocating resources 明智地分配资源

　　Critical domains 关键领域

　　Unforeseen ramifications 未预见的后果

　　Stymie personal endeavour 阻碍个人努力

　　Inadvertently dissuade 无意间劝阻

　　Engender a culture of dependency 产生依赖文化

　　Question of equity 公平问题