I've heard of the name "Ra" in connection with the Egyptians.
1.3 發問者：我曾聽過「Ra」這個名字與埃及人的關聯。
Are you connected with that Ra in any way?
你們是否以任何方式跟那個 Ra 有連結？
Yes, the connection is congruency. May we elucidate?
RA：我是 Ra。是的，這連結是一致的。我們可以闡明嗎？
{ Ra 傳訊的開頭通常會自報"I am Ra."。這句原文從 RA#001.03 開始省略不錄 }
Could you give me a little more detail about your role with the Egyptians?
1.5 發問者：關於你和埃及人在一起時的角色，你能否給我多一點細節？
The identity of the vibration Ra is our identity.
RA：我是 Ra。這個身分－振動(聲音) Ra－是我們的身分(識別)。
We as a group, or what you would call a social memory complex, made contact with a race of your planetary kind which you call Egyptians.
做為一個群體－或者你會稱為一個社會記憶複合體－我們曾與[屬於你們的行星]你們稱之為埃及人的種族接觸過。
Others from our density made contact at the same time in South America, and the so-called "lost cities" were their attempts to contribute to the Law of One.
在相同時間，[來自我們密度的一些其他實體]在南美洲進行接觸，所謂的「失落的城市」就是他們嘗試對"一的法則"有所貢獻(的成果)。{ 印加的 Machu Picchu }
We spoke to one who heard and understood and was in a position to decree the Law of One. However, the priests and peoples of that era quickly distorted our message, robbing it of the, shall we say, compassion with which unity is informed by its very nature. Since it contains all, it cannot abhor any.
我們曾對(埃及的)某個人說話、他聽見並理解了，接著在(他的)位置上頒布一的法則。然而，那個時代的祭司與人群快速地扭曲我們的訊息，剝奪了"一的法則"原本蘊含的悲憫心－藉著它、合一性的本質得以被知曉。因為它(合一性)包含一切，無法憎惡任何(存有)。
When we were no longer able to have appropriate channels through which to enunciate the Law of One, we removed ourselves from the now hypocritical position which we had allowed ourselves to be placed in.
當我們不再能夠擁有適當的管道、以透過它們清晰地發表"一的法則"，我們離開[我們曾允許自己]被放置的位置－因為它現在變得偽善。
And other myths, shall we say, other understandings having more to do with [polarity and the things] of your vibrational complex, again took over in that particular society complex.
而其他的神話、其他的理解－較多與你們的振動複合體有交集的極性以及事物－(它們)再次接管了那個特殊的社會複合體。{曾經的"一的法則"群組}
Does this form a sufficient amount of information, or could we speak further?
這是否構成足夠的資訊，或者我們可以進一步講說？
[Inaudible]
1.6 發問者：[聽不見]
Is there another query?
RA：是否有另一個詢問？
[The question was lost because the questioner was sitting too far from the tape recorder to be recorded.]
1.7 發問者：{這個問題遺失了，因為 發問者：坐的位置離用於錄音的錄音機太遠。}
Consider, if you will, that the universe isinfinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation.
RA：我是 Ra。如果你願意，可以考量宇宙為無限的。這點尚未被證明或被反駁(證偽)，但我們可以對你保證：你的自我、你的理解、你[所謂]的尋求旅程、或你對造物的感知、都沒有盡頭。
That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept.
無限不能是眾多的，因為"眾多性"是一個有限的概念。
To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity ; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning.
要有無限(的概念)，你必須[辨識或定義]那無限為"合一"－否則這個詞彙就沒有任何參考或意義。
In an Infinite Creator there is only unity.
在一個無限造物者之中、只有"合一"。
You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity.
你們已看過合一的簡單例子。你們已見過一個三稜鏡展現所有[源自於陽光的]顏色。這是個關於合一的簡化範例。
In truth there is no right or wrong.
事實上，(在合一的觀點裡)沒有對或錯。
There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time.
(在合一的觀點裡)沒有極性，因為[在你們憑藉的心/身/靈複合體之舞蹈中]的某一點、一切將達成和解－而你們在此時以各式各樣的方式扭曲該複合體，藉此娛樂自己。
This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things.
在任何情況下，這個扭曲(變貌)都不是必須的，而是由你們每一位所選擇的－做為一種替代的方式、去理解那[結合所有事物的]"完全合一"之思維。
You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things.
你不是一個類似[或有點相似]的實體或東西。
You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation.
你是每一個東西、每一個存有、每一種情感、每一個事件、每一個處境。
You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are.
你是合一、你是無限。你是愛/光、光/愛。你"是"。
This is the Law of One.
這就是"一的法則"。
May we enunciate this law in more detail?
我們可否更詳細地闡釋這個法則？
[Inaudible]
1.8 發問者：[聽不見]
Is there another query at this time?
RA：此時有另一個詢問嗎？
