點線面 vs 句段文

2406 blog

常說點→線→面, 今日有個感覺： 字→句→段→文, 之前一直在講的關係代名詞, 不定詞, 分詞等, 都是在說句, 現在想把句連成段.  而較好的方式, 就是找同一主題相關文章, 看看他們對同一事件的表述.  現在演算法都會推播相關文章, 這真的是一個省時, 省力的方式. 打入相關key word, 更可在短時間找出相關句子.

最近科技業在大裁員, 打入cost, lay off, reduce, cut等看看相關的句或段：下列一樣是取材自紐約時報：

1.       Volkswagen is looking to shrink its costly, heavily unionized work force in Europe, as well as trim its reliance on high-cost European auto parts manufacturers.

 大眾汽車正計劃收縮其成本高昂且高度工會化的歐洲員工規模，同時減少對高成本的歐洲汽車零部件製造商的依賴。

 ↑這仍算是一個句, 用as well as來連接

連接詞：as well as

句型：我要去賺錢 as well as 我要錢 → 都是s + vt + o的句型

as well as

2.       John said that his company had to lay off employees and control costs “so we can invest in these long-term, ambitious visions around A.I.” He added that he had come to realize that “we operate better as a leaner company.”

他的公司必須裁員並控制成本，「這樣我們才能投資於這些圍繞人工智慧的長期、雄心勃勃的願景」。他還說，他已經意識到，「我們作為一家更精簡的公司，運營得更好」。

 ↑這是一個小段, 由兩句構成, 並用that一直做連接

句1：John said that his company had to lay off employees and control costs “so we can invest in these long-term, ambitious visions around A.I.

句2：He added that he had come to realize that “we operate better as a leaner company.”

句1：我(s) 要(vt) 錢(o)+我要錢+我要錢 句型 →可以說是三個或四個 “我要錢”句型串接起來

John(s) said(vt) that(o)

          Company(s) lay off(vt) employees(o) and control(vt) costs(o)

                   We(s) invest(vt) visions(o)

That視為錢代, 裏面裝著另一個”我要錢”句型, 俗稱名詞子句

 so也視為錢代, 表達出結果, 俗稱副詞子句

句2：我(s) 要(vt) 錢(o)+錢(s) 來了(vi) + 不定詞

He(s) added(vt) that(o)

 He(s) had come(vi) to realize that “we operate better as a leaner company.(sc)

這句的sc(主詞補語)是不定詞形式, 裏面又有一個”錢(s) 來了(vi) ”小子句→we(s) operate(vi)

3, It tells me there is a focus on margins. They’re trimming where they can and redeploying resources.”

我就知道，他們關注的是利潤率。他們正在盡可能地裁員，並重新部署資源。

 ↑這是一個小段, 由兩句構成. 中間用逗號做區隔.

句1：It tells me there is a focus on margins.

句2：They’re trimming where they can and redeploying resources.”

句1：你(s) 給(vt) 我(o1) 錢(o2) + 錢(s) 在(vi) 這(sc) 句型

It(s) tells(vt) me(o1) that(o2) →o2的這個that省略, 直接把小子句寫出來

          there(sc) is(vi) focus(s) → 真正主詞為focus

句2：我(s) 要(vt) 錢(o)+錢(s) 來了(vi) + 我(s) 要(vt) 錢(o)

They(s) trim(vt) where they can(o) and redeploy(vt) resources(o)

→ where then can這個受詞是一個小子句

          They(s) can(vi)

以上講到這麼多錢, 應該越看越喜歡. 製造業的裁員是為了降低成本, 科技業的裁員是為了重新分配資源到其他領域. 

一樣要進行"刻意練習", 用一樣的句型去造句.