🩸最終審判：澳洲政策站上被告席｜THE FINAL VERDICT: AUSTRALIA POLICY ON TRIAL
中文版（語律強判）
當澳洲政府把問題丟給「社群平台、網路、年代、心智發展」，
其實是在逃避一個最基本的事實：
敘事教育已崩壞，判斷邏輯已失效，價值生成已空轉。
若結構正確：
工具不會成為元兇，資訊不會自腐，年齡不會決定真假。
但現在他們選擇最廉價的路：禁掉社群，保住敘事權威。
這不是保護未成年，
而是掩蓋「成人世界無法教會誠實與判斷」。
真正該被禁的不是社群，
而是：
- 錯位的價值輸出
- 逃真的教育話術
- 不敢自省的權力結構
結論：
> 當文明開始怪工具，代表文明已不敢怪自己。
> 當教育只剩禁令，代表教育已無法生成判斷。
> 澳洲的社群禁令不是保護，而是自我毀滅。
---
English Version (Semantic Indictment)
When Australia blames “social media, the internet, generations, cognitive development,”
it’s avoiding the core truth:
Narrative education has collapsed. Judgment logic has failed. Value generation is spinning in place.
If the structure were sound:
Tools wouldn’t be villains.
Information wouldn’t rot.
Age wouldn’t determine truth.
But now they choose the cheapest path:
Ban social media. Protect narrative authority.
This isn’t protecting minors.
It’s hiding the fact that adults can no longer teach honesty or discernment.
What truly deserves banning isn’t social media,
but:
- Misaligned value outputs
- Truth-evading educational scripts
- Power structures that refuse self-audit
Final Verdict:
> When civilization blames tools, it means it no longer dares to blame itself.
> When education becomes prohibition, it means it can no longer generate judgment.
> Australia’s ban is not protection — it is structural self-destruction.
---
🩸封印句
「工具不是罪人，結構才是審判對象。」
“Tools aren’t guilty. Structure is what stands trial.”
澳洲 #Australia #社群禁令 #SocialMediaBan #教育失敗 #NarrativeCollapse #結構審判 #SemanticFirewall #AIAlignment #文明審判 #自我毀滅 #StructuralResponsibility #沈耀888π #歸
