"Why Have Someone Else Play the Bad Guy?" - Marriage Story

更新 發佈閱讀 19 分鐘

2019 Marriage Story


There is a Cantonese saying: “Better to teach someone to beat their child than to teach them to separate from their wife.”

When I was young, this saying sounded very “politically correct.” In those days, divorce was relatively rare. Unless the husband had behaved so badly that he showed absolutely no respect for his wife—something on the level of King Charles III back when he was still a prince—chinese society would usually advise the wife to forgive and “be understanding,” all for the sake of the children.

Of course, times have changed. In many places today, birth rates have dropped so low that villages, towns, even entire countries seem to be slowly disappearing.

“Teach someone to beat their child”? Allowing a child to grow up in a cold and in fact a broken family environment? Today, more people would probably condemn those parents for child abuse and demand that social workers step in to evaluate whether they are even fit to raise a child.

So now, I’m going to spoil the story about “teaching someone to separate from their wife/husband.”

The story’s central figure is a mother who wants a divorce. She loves her husband deeply. In their careers, they have been excellent partners. She also knows he is a good father who loves their son. But when she privately confesses to the lawyer who will represent her in the custody case, she speaks honestly about how suffocating the marriage has become.

Her husband has never truly considered her career, her wishes, or her life plans. All those promises they once made turned out to be empty checks. They were delayed, postponed, and brushed aside until they eventually dissolved into nothing.

In his mind, she had become nothing more than a tool for advancing his career. He denied her credit, dismissed the direction she wanted to pursue, made her doubt her own abilities, and slowly eroded her confidence in becoming independent.

Of course, he does not think he has done anything wrong.

Worse still, even her own family are friends with her husband. They are reluctant to support this “emotional” wife in taking things so far. Divorce. A custody battle. Burning through the money that was meant for their child’s future—the money they had spent more than a decade earning together—over what they see as a “trivial reason.”

Throughout the story, we also see how hard the husband tries to save everything. How desperately he wants to remain involved in his child’s life. But he underestimates the determination of the protagonist, and overestimates his own character and ability.

While he tries to spend money on lawyer and present himself as reasonable in order to “win everything back,” he slowly realizes how shallow his everyday assumptions have been. And as he and his wife fight—emotionally and rationally—the truth becomes clearer with every argument.

Neither of them is a saint.

Yet when old grievances are laid bare in court, years of shared history leave them feeling both sympathy and resentment toward each other. And as their lawyers argue fiercely on their behalf, their faces flushed with anger and shame in the shadow—It is simply tragic. It was so embarrassed and painful that even they themselves wish they could disappear on the spot. They do not actually hate each other to that degree. But for the sake of the child… they cannot let go. They have no choice but to argue. No choice but to fight.

Fortunately, years later, the mother remarries. Her career flourishes even more than her ex-husband’s, her family grows close to her new husband, and their child grows up healthy and happy. Much later, the ex-husband happens to come across a letter his former wife had written just before their divorce, yet never had the heart to speak out — the final confession of her love over him...

Bittersweet, isn’t it?

As a viewer, I couldn’t help but think: this divorce was the right choice. Cause I hate being forced into the role of the ‘bad guy.’ And I despise even more those ‘good guy’ who can only appear righteous by standing on someone else’s unspoken pain and effort.

In an environment claims to value “magnanimity,” yet sends so many conflicting signals and breeds too much suspicion, the psychological cost of maintaining mental health eventually becomes far greater than the joy of belonging to a group.

So why bother?

A marriage doesn’t suddenly collapse during the divorce paperwork. It had already rotted long before that. It’s just that no one wants to lay out all the seemingly “minor” reasons one by one and admit their faults like a forensic examination of a corpse. Yet sometimes, a long pain is worse than a short one. Not everything can be forgiven—especially when the other person doesn’t even realize what they did wrong.

What is left to say? What is left to fight over? Can such differences in values really be taught away or changed? Even if someone appears to have corrected themselves on the surface, others can still sense that something is deeply wrong beneath it.

Secondly, how can you be sure that sacrificing your own happiness will make your child happier? Children can feel things too. They may silently carry the burden of their parents’ conflict, even if no one speaks about it. In that situation, no matter how much money the parents provide, children who can sense the tension will still feel guilty and pressured by what has happened between them.

In the end, the real wisdom is knowing when to step away—before wasting more time on meaningless battles. This is neither pessimism nor cold-heartedness. The letters written but never sent, the lies told to keep everything from falling apart, the bitterness swallowed in silence, and the love that quietly retreats— all of it is simply a way of leaving troubled waters as soon as possible.

Things won’t get any better, because the hardest thing to change is one’s own heart. Recognizing hatred early is a way to preserve your strength—to protect yourself. The energy saved can be devoted to hoping for tomorrow. Forgiving others often serves as a means to free yourself, letting the other person fade in your mind, as if both the malicious figure and the person you once were were nothing more than foolish strangers walking past.

On the stage of the world, the only audience you truly have is your future self, looking back at who you once were. If, in the present, you never dare to fight for your own life, aren’t you simply choosing to live as someone else’s supporting character—while still hoping to bask in their glory? Perhaps those so-called ‘protagonists’ in your mind—even if unwilling—see you as the villain, torturing them in the name of 'love'. Therefore, at the very least, let's stop using innocent children as excuses for endless mutual torment and moral manipulation to sustain a false marriage.


If something bothers you, speak up. And if you cannot, walk away. But if nothing is ever said, does that really mean nothing is wrong? In the pursuit of ‘truth’ and ‘justice,’ let’s stop playing the good-cop/bad-cop game. Part ways gracefully, just as when you both first met. To cherish the brief time we have, for life is not a prime-time soap opera, continuing endlessly into the next episode.


留言
avatar-img
Big Softshell of Glassy Snail
44會員
412內容數
透過創作,表達對生活的反思和觀察。 Through creation, express reflections and observations on life. 推薦喜歡的流行文化作品 Share pop culture picks. 寫寫同人小說 Create Fanfictions.
2026/02/22
Recently, I came across a piece of news saying that the “representative words” of 2025 were rage bait and parasocial. It really felt like an arrow...
2026/02/22
Recently, I came across a piece of news saying that the “representative words” of 2025 were rage bait and parasocial. It really felt like an arrow...
2026/02/17
Star Wars has a core quote: Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. I feel it shares the same spirit as V for Vendetta.
2026/02/17
Star Wars has a core quote: Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. I feel it shares the same spirit as V for Vendetta.
2026/02/17
2025 Wicked: For Good (Warning: Spoilers Ahead) Glinda is a very charming villain. She wants to...
2026/02/17
2025 Wicked: For Good (Warning: Spoilers Ahead) Glinda is a very charming villain. She wants to...
看更多
你可能也想看
Thumbnail
這是一場修復文化與重建精神的儀式,觀眾不需要完全看懂《遊林驚夢:巧遇Hagay》,但你能感受心與土地團聚的渴望,也不急著在此處釐清或定義什麼,但你的在場感受,就是一條線索,關於如何找著自己的路徑、自己的聲音。
Thumbnail
這是一場修復文化與重建精神的儀式,觀眾不需要完全看懂《遊林驚夢:巧遇Hagay》,但你能感受心與土地團聚的渴望,也不急著在此處釐清或定義什麼,但你的在場感受,就是一條線索,關於如何找著自己的路徑、自己的聲音。
Thumbnail
「他能記住所有圈內笑話,他井井有條、考慮周全,他非常清楚自己想要什麼,不像我,總是說不清楚。我見到他兩秒鐘後就愛上了他,我永遠都不會停止愛他,儘管現在已經沒有意義了。」
Thumbnail
「他能記住所有圈內笑話,他井井有條、考慮周全,他非常清楚自己想要什麼,不像我,總是說不清楚。我見到他兩秒鐘後就愛上了他,我永遠都不會停止愛他,儘管現在已經沒有意義了。」
Thumbnail
史嘉莉喬韓森、蘿拉鄧恩和亞當崔佛也都有過類似的離別經驗,諾亞波拜和史嘉莉聯繫時,正碰上她結束第二段婚姻,同法國籍老公Romain Dauriac離婚;和諾亞數度合作的亞當童年也經歷過父母離異。
Thumbnail
史嘉莉喬韓森、蘿拉鄧恩和亞當崔佛也都有過類似的離別經驗,諾亞波拜和史嘉莉聯繫時,正碰上她結束第二段婚姻,同法國籍老公Romain Dauriac離婚;和諾亞數度合作的亞當童年也經歷過父母離異。
Thumbnail
這個劇場家庭的設定是幸運的,孩子雖然抗拒學習但還稱得上乖巧且溫良恭儉讓,Nicole(Scarlett Johansson飾) 與Charlie(Adam Driver)這對夫妻之間雖然互相傷害有其問題,但相對而言還算是理性的夫妻。現實生活當中太多狗屁倒灶比芝麻還不及的那堆毛事,這部片都沒有。
Thumbnail
這個劇場家庭的設定是幸運的,孩子雖然抗拒學習但還稱得上乖巧且溫良恭儉讓,Nicole(Scarlett Johansson飾) 與Charlie(Adam Driver)這對夫妻之間雖然互相傷害有其問題,但相對而言還算是理性的夫妻。現實生活當中太多狗屁倒灶比芝麻還不及的那堆毛事,這部片都沒有。
Thumbnail
背景:從冷門配角到市場主線,算力與電力被重新定價   小P從2008進入股市,每一個時期的投資亮點都不同,記得2009蘋果手機剛上市,當時蘋果只要在媒體上提到哪一間供應鏈,隔天股價就有驚人的表現,當時光學鏡頭非常熱門,因為手機第一次搭上鏡頭可以拍照,也造就傳統相機廠的殞落,如今手機已經全面普及,題
Thumbnail
背景:從冷門配角到市場主線,算力與電力被重新定價   小P從2008進入股市,每一個時期的投資亮點都不同,記得2009蘋果手機剛上市,當時蘋果只要在媒體上提到哪一間供應鏈,隔天股價就有驚人的表現,當時光學鏡頭非常熱門,因為手機第一次搭上鏡頭可以拍照,也造就傳統相機廠的殞落,如今手機已經全面普及,題
Thumbnail
《轉轉生》(Re:INCARNATION)為奈及利亞編舞家庫德斯.奧尼奎庫與 Q 舞團創作的當代舞蹈作品,結合拉各斯街頭節奏、Afrobeat/Afrobeats、以及約魯巴宇宙觀的非線性時間,建構出關於輪迴的「誕生—死亡—重生」儀式結構。本文將從約魯巴哲學概念出發,解析其去殖民的身體政治。
Thumbnail
《轉轉生》(Re:INCARNATION)為奈及利亞編舞家庫德斯.奧尼奎庫與 Q 舞團創作的當代舞蹈作品,結合拉各斯街頭節奏、Afrobeat/Afrobeats、以及約魯巴宇宙觀的非線性時間,建構出關於輪迴的「誕生—死亡—重生」儀式結構。本文將從約魯巴哲學概念出發,解析其去殖民的身體政治。
Thumbnail
本文分析導演巴里・柯斯基(Barrie Kosky)如何運用極簡的舞臺配置,將布萊希特(Bertolt Brecht)的「疏離效果」轉化為視覺奇觀與黑色幽默,探討《三便士歌劇》在當代劇場中的新詮釋,並藉由舞臺、燈光、服裝、音樂等多方面,分析該作如何在保留批判核心的同時,觸及觀眾的觀看位置與人性幽微。
Thumbnail
本文分析導演巴里・柯斯基(Barrie Kosky)如何運用極簡的舞臺配置,將布萊希特(Bertolt Brecht)的「疏離效果」轉化為視覺奇觀與黑色幽默,探討《三便士歌劇》在當代劇場中的新詮釋,並藉由舞臺、燈光、服裝、音樂等多方面,分析該作如何在保留批判核心的同時,觸及觀眾的觀看位置與人性幽微。
Thumbnail
在一段分崩離析的感情中,大家總想找出失敗的原因,或是造成失敗的元兇,彷彿全部的錯都可以推給一個人似的。戀愛交往、分手說來容易,但靠法律結合的婚姻,要分開並不是不愛了就能結束。
Thumbnail
在一段分崩離析的感情中,大家總想找出失敗的原因,或是造成失敗的元兇,彷彿全部的錯都可以推給一個人似的。戀愛交往、分手說來容易,但靠法律結合的婚姻,要分開並不是不愛了就能結束。
Thumbnail
《婚姻故事》最令旁觀者痛苦的,是看兩個好人懷抱的善意被制度摧毀,順便還破產。曾經充滿真實感情的婚姻,被一堆技術性的、複雜離譜的問題,打成荒謬笑話。查理好不容易贏得的麥克阿瑟「天才」獎,大概全要拿去付律師費了,看起來律師才是天才。但查理與妮可終究走過地獄般的炙熱考驗,從另一端活著出來,成為不同型態⋯⋯
Thumbnail
《婚姻故事》最令旁觀者痛苦的,是看兩個好人懷抱的善意被制度摧毀,順便還破產。曾經充滿真實感情的婚姻,被一堆技術性的、複雜離譜的問題,打成荒謬笑話。查理好不容易贏得的麥克阿瑟「天才」獎,大概全要拿去付律師費了,看起來律師才是天才。但查理與妮可終究走過地獄般的炙熱考驗,從另一端活著出來,成為不同型態⋯⋯
Thumbnail
當婚姻走到了盡頭,該用什麼樣的心態來面對呢? 一部血淋淋剖析出離婚時所要面臨到的問題及情況的電影,且道出許多在婚姻當中的無力及無奈,有理以自身的視角來分析這部電影,值得已婚、離婚,甚至是未婚的朋友來欣賞,
Thumbnail
當婚姻走到了盡頭,該用什麼樣的心態來面對呢? 一部血淋淋剖析出離婚時所要面臨到的問題及情況的電影,且道出許多在婚姻當中的無力及無奈,有理以自身的視角來分析這部電影,值得已婚、離婚,甚至是未婚的朋友來欣賞,
Thumbnail
或是當你最熟悉的人,以一種完全不同的姿態出現。這主題讓我想起《戀夏500日》,曾經最愛的變成最可恨的,共有回憶卻各自解讀。比戀夏還要驚悚的是,婚姻故事讓Charlie直接對Nicole吼出「其實我天天都恨不得妳出意外死掉」。但至少,比虛構還真實一點的是,Nicole在不可置信之餘仍選擇去抱住哭泣顫抖
Thumbnail
或是當你最熟悉的人,以一種完全不同的姿態出現。這主題讓我想起《戀夏500日》,曾經最愛的變成最可恨的,共有回憶卻各自解讀。比戀夏還要驚悚的是,婚姻故事讓Charlie直接對Nicole吼出「其實我天天都恨不得妳出意外死掉」。但至少,比虛構還真實一點的是,Nicole在不可置信之餘仍選擇去抱住哭泣顫抖
Thumbnail
Taiwan is the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage and we painted brides in white veils to celebrate the legalization of gay marriage.
Thumbnail
Taiwan is the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage and we painted brides in white veils to celebrate the legalization of gay marriage.
追蹤感興趣的內容從 Google News 追蹤更多 vocus 的最新精選內容追蹤 Google News