· Altholz, Josef L. Anatomy of a controversy: the debate over Essays and reviews, 1860-1864. London: Routledge, 1994.
· Bebbington, David W. Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
· Brooke, John Hedley. Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
· Brock, W. H., Macleod, R. M. “The Scientists' Declaration: Reflexions on Science and Belief in the Wake of ‘Essays and Reviews,’ 1864-5,” The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 9, no. 1 Mar 1976.
· Catherine Hall, White. Male and Middle Class: Explorations in Feminism and History, London: Polity Press, 1991.
· Clayton Roberts, David Roberts著,賈士蘅譯,《英國史 下冊》,臺北:五南圖書,1986。
· Ellis, Ieuan. Seven against Christ: a study of ‘essays and reviews’. London: E. J. Brill, 1994.
· Harris, Jose. Private Lives, Public Spirits: A Social History of Britain, 1870-1914. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
· J. Larson, Edward著,陳恒安譯,《雀鳥、果蠅與上帝:演化論的歷史》,新北:左岸文化,2005。
· Jowett, Benjamin. Essays and reviews. London: John W. Parker and Son, 1860.
· Livingstone, David N., Darryl G. Hart, and Mark A. Noll, eds. Evangelicals and science in historical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
· Lucas, John Randolph. “Wilberforce and Huxley: a Legendary Encounter,” The Historical Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, June 1979.
· O' Connor, Ralph, "Young-earth creationists in early nineteenth-century Britain? Towards a reassessment of ‘Scriptural Geology’," History of Science, vol. 45, no. 4, 2007.
· Parsons, Gerald. "Reform, revival and realignment: the experience of Victorian Anglicanism," in Gerald Parsons, ed., Religion in Victorian Britain: Volume 1 Traditions. Manchester: Manchester University, 1988.
· Rudnick, M. J. S. "The emergence of a visual language for geological science," History of science, vol. 14, no. 3, 1976.
· Steinbach, Susie L. Understanding The Victorians: Politics, Culture and Society in Nineteenth-Century Britain, London: Routledge, 2012.
· W. C. 丹皮爾著,李珩譯,《科學史及其與哲學和宗教的關係》,台北:明文,1992。
[1]關於該辯論以及其後續的發展,可參閱John Randolph Lucas, “Wilberforce and Huxley: a Legendary Encounter,” The Historical Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, June 1979, pp. 313-330.
[5] Jose Harris, Private Lives, Public Spirits: A Social History of Britain, 1870-1914 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 170-171.
[6] Jose Harris, Private Lives, Public Spirits: A Social History of Britain, 1870-1914, pp. 169-177.
[7] Susie L. Steinbach, Understanding The Victorians: Politics, Culture and Society in Nineteenth-Century Britain (London: Routledge, 2012), p. 223. 轉引自林依萍,〈為信仰辯護:論柴斯特頓作品在當代的宗教意義〉,頁11。
[8] David W Bebbington, Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 2. 中文翻譯有多種版本,本文乃參考林依萍,〈為信仰辯護:論柴斯特頓作品在當代的宗教意義〉,頁12。
[9] Catherine Hall, White, Male and Middle Class: Explorations in Feminism and History (London: Polity Press, 1991), pp. 75-86.
[10] W. C. 丹皮爾著,李珩譯,《科學史及其與哲學和宗教的關係》(台北:明文,1992),頁305-311、319-322、404-406。
[11] M. J. S Rudnick, “The emergence of a visual language for geological science,” History of science, vol. 14, no. 3, 1976, pp. 149-152.
[12] David N. Livingstone, D.G. Hart, Mark A. Noll eds., Evangelicals and science in historical perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 178.
[13] John Hedley Brooke, Science and religion: Some historical perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp.261-264.
[14] John Hedley Brooke, Science and religion: Some historical perspectives, pp. 275-289.
[15] David N. Livingstone, D.G. Hart, Mark A. Noll eds., Evangelicals and science in historical perspective, p. 177.
[16] John Hedley Brooke, Science and religion: Some historical perspectives, pp. 297-298.
[17] Ralph O' Connor, “Young-earth creationists in early nineteenth-century Britain? Towards a reassessment of ‘Scriptural Geology’,” History of Science, vol. 45, no. 4, 2007, pp. 364-366.
[18] Ralph O' Connor, “Young-earth creationists in early nineteenth-century Britain? Towards a reassessment of ‘Scriptural Geology’,” p. 372.
[19] John Hedley Brooke, Science and religion: Some historical perspectives, p. 295.
[20] Edward J. Larson著,陳恒安譯,《雀鳥、果蠅與上帝:演化論的歷史》(新北:左岸文化,2005),頁82-83。
[21] “The Volume, it is hoped, will be received as an attempt to illustrate the advantage derivable to the cause of religious and moral truth.” Benjamin Jowett, Essays and reviews, TO THE READER.
[22] Ieuan Ellis, Seven against Christ: a study of ‘essays and reviews’ (London: E. J. Brill, 1994), pp.50-54.
[23] W. H. Brock, R. M. Macleod, “The Scientists’ Declaration: Reflexions on Science and Belief in the Wake of ‘Essays and Reviews,’ 1864-5,” The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 9, no. 1 Mar 1976, pp.39-40.
[24] Ieuan Ellis, Seven against Christ: a study of ‘essays and reviews’, pp. 75-76.
[25] John Hedley Brooke, Science and religion: Some historical perspectives, p. 369.
[26] Josef L. Altholz, Anatomy of a Controversy: The Debate over 'Essays and Reviews' 1860-64 (London: Routledge, 2017), pp. 1-2.
[27] Victor Shea, William Whitla, eds., Victorian Literature: An Anthology (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015), p.132.
[28] Gerald Parsons, “Reform, revival and realignment: the experience of Victorian Anglicanism,” in Gerald Parsons, ed., Religion in Victorian Britain: Volume 1 Traditions (Manchester: Manchester University, 1988), p. 40.
[29] W. H. Brock, R. M. Macleod, “The Scientists' Declaration: Reflexions on Science and Belief in the Wake of ‘Essays and Reviews,’ 1864-5,” pp. 58-60.