國會要查帳 英國王室剉咧等

【Comment】皇室的財產複雜，有些是政府的，有些屬於王權、有些是皇室成員個人身分的（如聯合王國王儲的Cornwall領地）或許還有真正私人的，不可相混。這點區別，共產主義與中華文化下成長的，難以理解也不願接受。蘇聯與羅曼諾夫，民國與愛新覺羅、1949後與資本家就是。居然，12海浬的海床屬於皇室（ownership of our national seabed stretching out 12 nautical miles around Britain），真不可思議。或許還有 City of London的種種。George III handed the Crown’s property to the state in return for an annual fee to support his duties. 則是權利與權利的互換交易，權利並未消失只是變換形式。或許，較有趣的是在境外（或舊稱「王權直轄殖民地」）的有形無形財產吧。看到美國政府要課國民在全球各地的稅、美國要境外免稅天堂交出資料，以及聯合王國政府要查皇室的財產。直覺得有趣。另外，有沒有注意到「PAC與王室一項引發非議的協議」，很像日本內閣與日本銀行的協議。可能還有東西很像 Sovereign Grant，不是嗎？

【相關閱讀】
COA Duchy of Cornwall
凱爾特之國：威廉王子大婚4
超越世俗不斷進步的達賴法王

國會要查帳 英國王室剉咧等◎自由時報（2013.02.10）http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2013/new/feb/10/today-int3.htm

英國要求緊縮的氣氛日益濃厚，如今就連王室帳冊也要接受外界檢驗。英國「獨立報」九日披露，英國國會負責監督政府財政事務的公共審計委員會（PAC），預料今年稍後將首度針對女王及王室財務狀況提出質詢，屆時女王最親信的幕僚恐將就王室是否為納稅人的錢帶來增值，接受議員質詢。

去年四月生效的「君王撥款法案（Sovereign Grant Acts）」，首度賦予國會監督王室財務狀況的權力。英國財政大臣奧斯本廢除政府王室年俸（Civi LIST），轉而將王室資產管理局（Crown Estate）的15％利潤歸屬王室。

PAC是英國國會權力最大的監督單位，去年底為整治跨國企業避稅問題，狠狠地將星巴克、亞馬遜及高盛等大企業的高層主管羞辱一頓，還就內閣官員的稅務及部會支出浪費情況進行嚴厲質詢。

報導指出，PAC以疾言厲色著稱，向來對那些沒有妥善運用公款的公僕及政府機關不假辭色。面對PAC質詢，白金漢宮可能會不寒而慄，「剉咧等」。

英國國家審計辦公室預定下月就可獲准了解女王的財務狀況。審計官員將針對他們的發現，向PAC提出報告。由工黨國會議員霍奇（Margaret Hodge）擔任主席的PAC，再決定質詢範圍，包括是否要求王室官員前來作證。

該委員會消息人士透露，一旦PAC做出決定，包括王室的交通、官方活動及王宮修繕的開銷等，屆時都將接受檢驗。但根據PAC與王室一項引發非議的協議，王儲查爾斯從其康瓦爾領地獲取的主要收入，以及管理女王伊莉莎白二世私人財產的「蘭開斯特公爵領地」信託公司，將不在PAC的檢驗範圍。

據估計，白金漢宮今年四月將可從王室資產管理局獲得三千六百一十萬英鎊（約十六億九千六百三十萬台幣），做為女王履行官方職責的經費，比去年由納稅人出資的三千一百萬英鎊增加十六％。

Exclusive: Royal books face MPs' scrutiny for first time ◎The Independent（2013.02.10）http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/exclusive-royal-books-face-mps-scrutiny-for-first-time-8487906.html

The Queen’s closest aides face the prospect of a historic public grilling by MPs about whether the Royal Family is providing value for taxpayers’ money.

Parliament’s most powerful watchdog, the Public Accounts Committee, is expected to launch an inquiry later this year into the finances of the Queen and the Royal Family.  This follows a change in the law which, for the first time, gives MPs oversight of royal finances.

Such an inquiry will cause trepidation in Buckingham Palace because of the committee’s formidable reputation for lambasting civil servants and government departments if it deems they have misused public funds.

As well as shaming Amazon, Starbucks and Goldman Sachs over their tax affairs, the committee has grilled a succession of Whitehall bosses over their tax affairs, the committee has grilled a succession of Whitehall bosses over wasteful spending in their departments. Often these have led to damning public reports.  This week alone the MPs accused the Department of Work and Pensions of causing “misery and hardship”, the Department of Health of “abject failure” and the Department of Energy of “failing to get to grip” with Britain’s mountain of nuclear waste.

The PAC, chaired by the former Labour minister Margaret Hodge, will decide on the scope of any inquiry after the National Audit Office is granted access to the Queen’s finances next month.  Auditors will produce a report on their findings which will then be scrutinised by the committee who will decide whether to call palace officials to give evidence.  Committee sources indicated that this was likely to happen.

“Margaret wants to do it – but obviously it’s got to be a decision of the whole committee,” said a source.

“I’m all in favour of it,” said Austin Mitchell, a Labour MP who sits on the committee.  “It’s not intrusive. It is about ensuring that the public are getting good value for money.

“At the moment there is no accountability for spending what is a considerable fortune.”

Among the areas the committee is expected to examine are transport costs including the Royal Train and the Royal Flight, as well as money spent on official entertaining and the upkeep of palaces.

Money given to junior royals to support their work backing up the Queen will also be scrutinised while the committee may also want to examine whether Buckingham Palace is doing enough to raise money itself by selling the royal brand.

For example while Buckingham Palace now opens to paying visitors during the summer some have argued it should be open all year round.  Two of the Queen’s other castles, Balmoral and Sandringham, have no public access at all – despite their multimillion-pound maintenance costs.

The change has come about after George Osborne scrapped the Civil List – an annual handout to the Royal Family that has had to be approved by Parliament since 1760 – in favour of paying the Monarch 15 per cent of the income from the Crown Estates as a new “Sovereign Grant”.

Crown Estate assets include Regent Street in London, Ascot racecourse and Windsor Great Park, 265,000 acres of farmland, as well as ownership of our national seabed stretching out 12 nautical miles around Britain.  The Estate’s profits have been paid to the Treasury and taxpayers since 1760, after George III handed the Crown’s property to the state in return for an annual fee to support his duties.  The income from the estates, now more than £240m is expected to increase to £450m by 2020 – which would more than double the Queen’s income from taxpayers’ to £67.5m at a time when voters have been told to expect a decade of austerity.

In April Buckingham Palace will receive £36.1m to fund the Queen’s official duties, a 16 per cent increase on the £31m paid by taxpayers last year.

MPs will examine the business strategy of the Crown Estates, which has been criticised for investing heavily in offshore wind farms, which Prince Charles has criticised as a “horrendous blot on the landscape”.

But under a controversial deal with the Palace the main income of the Prince of Wales, which he gets through the Duchy of Cornwall, will be outside the PAC’s scrutiny.  The Duchy of Lancaster, a trust that provides the Queen’s private income, is also exempt.

The unprecedented parliamentary inquiry will mean that Sir Alan Reid, the Keeper of the Privy Purse – effectively the Queen’s treasurer – will face the full glare of publicity by being questioned in front of the television cameras.  Sir Christopher Geidt, the Queen’s private secretary, could also be called to give evidence.  “We will be looking into the royals later this year,” a committee source said.  “We need to be sure when other public services are being cut that there is value for money.  We would certainly want to speak to the most senior people who control the purse strings.”

The Conservative MP Jacob Rees Mogg said that while he backed the move to give Parliament scrutiny of the Queen’s expenses it had to be “proportionate”.  “It is perfectly reasonable for Parliament to examine expenditure on areas like royal palaces, state banquets and the postal service.  But it would be unreasonable to examine the Queen’s private sources of income and expenditure and whether she prefers chocolate or plain Hobnobs.

“The Public Accounts Committee’s main job is to scrutinise large areas of national expenditure running to billions of pounds.  I’m sure … it will not want to spend too large amount of time on the Royal Household which provides very good value for money.”

Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

Making a royal mint: Questions for the Queen

Subsidised royals

The Queen’s public subsidy not only pays for her work – but that of other members of “the firm” as well.  The committee will want to look at how many public visits are carried out by members of the Royal Family, and how much each of the Queen’s relatives gets in subsidy from the Monarch (and hence the taxpayer).

Hospitality

Accounts in 2011 show that the Queen entertained over 76,000 guests, including 41,000 people who attended the seven royal garden parties.  The committee may want to examine the costs per-head of these events and whether they could be done more cheaply.

Travel

Buckingham Palace’s travel accounts show that most of the £6.1m travel costs went on air travel – with £2.4m on helicopters and £2.2m on planes.  Top of the Public Accounts Committee’s priorities may be to look at the travel costs associated with lesser members of the Royal Family such as Prince Andrew – nicknamed “Airmiles Andy” because of his allegedly expensive travel tastes.

Revenue raising

More than 600,000 people paid to visit Buckingham Palace last year when it opened during the summer, raising £10m in ticket sales.  But the committee may question why the palace is not open for longer and whether other royal palaces could be opened up to the public.