<p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><b><strong class=lexical__textBold style=white-space: pre-wrap;>【雙魚之論】英文拷到 </strong></b><a href=https://translate.google.com.tw/?hl=zh-TW&tab=wT&sl=auto&tl=zh-TW&op=translate><b></strong></b></a><b><strong class=lexical__textBold style=white-space: pre-wrap;> / </strong></b><a href=https://www.deepl.com/translator><b></strong></b></a><b><strong class=lexical__textBold style=white-space: pre-wrap;> 找中文翻譯</strong></b></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><a href=https://hoonting.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post_3.html><b><strong class=lexical__textBold style=white-space: pre-wrap;>五權改三權:先虛再廢,或廢院不廢權(總統的問題,再說~)</strong></b></a></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><a href=https://hoonting.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post.html><b><strong class=lexical__textBold style=white-space: pre-wrap;>20240531 陳亭妃:中華民國憲法增修條文部分條文修正草案</strong></b></a></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><a href=https://hoonting.blogspot.com/2024/06/4552.html><b><strong class=lexical__textBold style=white-space: pre-wrap;>〈立法院職權行使法修正條文〉(有關國會調查權45~52)</strong></b></a></p><p class=lexical__paragraph><br></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><span style=white-space: pre-wrap;>修憲解決監察院問題,是制度派的觀點。我無異見,但這是藉故拖延,不是正面解決問題的態度。</span></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><span style=white-space: pre-wrap;>棘手政治問題,我同意可以「兩階段」處理。約略如下:</span></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><span style=white-space: pre-wrap;>1. 修訂立法院組織法,設立隸屬立法院的獨立機關Ombudsman署</span></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><span style=white-space: pre-wrap;>2. 監察院編制常任公務員,移撥到立法院Ombudsman署</span></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><span style=white-space: pre-wrap;>3. 立法院刪減監察院的作業預算,到無法行使監察權的地步。</span></p><p class=lexical__paragraph dir=ltr><span style=white-space: pre-wrap;>4. 監察委員的薪水,維持至本屆結束為止。總統承諾不再提名監察委員,提名的話立法院不給作業經費。</span></p>