2024-06-01|閱讀時間 ‧ 約 27 分鐘

20240531 陳亭妃:中華民國憲法增修條文部分條文修正草案

    【雙魚之論】英文拷到 G / D 找中文翻譯

    Chen Ting-fei's Proposed Constitutional Amendments: Tactical Maneuvering, Strategic Move, or Intraparty Competition?

    On the flip side, the Kuomintang's Pursuit of Congressional Investigative Powers and Contempt of Congress: Genuine Reform or Political Shock gesture? Ultimately, Both Appear to be Short-term Political Power Struggles. 

    The proposed constitutional amendments by Chen Ting-fei, a senior Democratic Progressive Party legislator, aim to abolish the Examination Yuan and the Control Yuan. With 30 DPP lawmakers co-signing on, this move could be comprehended in several ways:

    Tactical maneuvering: It may be a political tactic to advance the party's agenda within the legislative process.

    Strategic action: It could be a calculated long-term strategy to reshape Taiwan's constitutional framework.

    Intraparty competition: The proposal may also be driven by internal party dynamics and competition.

    In contrast, the Kuomintang's push for congressional investigative powers and contempt of Congress charges seems to overlook the significant constitutional conflicts surrounding the role of the Control Yuan. This raises questions about the KMT's intentions:

    Genuine reform: The Kuomintang's actions may stem from a sincere desire to strengthen legislative oversight.

    Political shock gesture: Alternatively, this move could be aimed at delivering a political shock to William Lai’s new administration.

    Ultimately, both cases appear to be instances of short-term political power struggles, lacking a clear, long-term vision for substantive constitutional reform. They seem to be driven more by immediate political considerations than by a coherent, principled approach to addressing Taiwan's deeper constitutional challenges.

    民進黨籍立委陳亭妃的修憲提案要廢除考試院與監察院,有30名民進黨籍立委簽署,是一種議事戰術,還是戰略作為?或者,是意在黨內競爭?

    相反的,國民黨要爭的「國會調查權」與「藐視國會罪」,卻忽視監察院角色的重大憲政衝突的事實,是真心改革,還是給新總統政治震撼教育而已?

    看起來都是無長期目標的政治力推擠(戰鬥)而已。

     

    中華民國憲法增修條文部分條文修正草案

    案由:本院委員陳亭妃等 人,鑑於歐美、日韓等世界民主國家的「憲政主義」均採學者孟德斯鳩與約翰潘克「三權分立」、「權力分立」之理論體,制訂一部有效的三權分立制度設計形成對政府權力的制衡機制,從而有效地防止權力專橫。其有關考試權或者是人員任用制度是在行政權之下,有關監督權限實屬立法權之下。然、唯獨中華民國採取「三民主義、五權憲法」的理論政體,單獨將考試權與監察權抽的設計,恐有擾亂行政權在人事任用上及剝奪立法權在監察上之權力,致使我國憲政體制異於其他民主國家、形成重疊及怪異之現象。

    另異於世界民主國家政體的還有中華人民共和國、越南社會主義共和國、寮人民民主共和國、朝鮮民主主義人民共和國、古巴共和國,其採用「共產主義」的理論政體。基此,爰擬具「中華民國憲法增修條文部分條文修正草案」,修改第三條、第四條、第六條、第七條之考試院、監察院相關條文,並將兩院職權整併入行政院與立法院;明定行政院設獨立機關,掌理國家考試及公務人員銓敘、撫卹、選用等法制事項;再由立法院司職調查、彈劾、糾舉、糾正,審計之權,俾利健全我國憲政、符合人民殷切期盼權責更相、更有率的政府體制,進而為台灣打造一個更加完善運作的民主憲政體系。是否有當?敬請公決。

    提案人(略)

    分享至
    成為作者繼續創作的動力吧!
    © 2024 vocus All rights reserved.