真理

真理

更新於 發佈於 閱讀時間約 13 分鐘
raw-image

昨天在我終於接受自己是個瘋子之後,半夜突然真理的辯證過程就突然如同潮水一樣流入我的意識。我終於徹底地瘋了(笑)這邊跟大家分享我當下寫下來的紀錄。

Damn it! Yes! Why do things have to make sense? They don’t! If meaning can vary and change through perception change, then life can only be meaningless to be true.

Anti-matter is consciousness. Then it’s the flow of creation. The truth simply IS. What is cannot be not. What’s not cannot be IS. Truth is not something to be believed or convinced. Because no matter what you choose to believe, truth is just simply IS. It has been and always will be. Therefore no beliefs are the truth!!! Fuck! You enter a belief means you enter a process of creation to proof it’s only true. Belief can be chosen to belief or disbelief which means enters division, which will only create existence, therefore existence and beliefs both not truth.

Every belief needn’t proof of any form, because it’s simply a process of “make true” as creation. What we perceived as proof for a belief is just simply reinforcement of the process of creation of the belief to be experienced until it is experienced. So if everything we experience in the existence is a process of creation, turning what’s not into what is will be unnecessary. Say you want to experience a glass of water, you just gotta manifest a glass of water, there’s no need fo turn a rock into a glass of water. If you want to experience a rock, just manifest a rock. In the realm which is closer to initial creation energy is not separated from each other. Therefore in the realm of rock=water there’s still no need for making what IS rock into water, because they are one.

To experience truth will only be possible when you eliminate the state of “無明“(un-enlightenment). To eliminate un-enlightment needn’t intelligence, intelligence/complexion is in division therefore will never lead to truth, will only lead to untruth. 因此無智亦無得,以無所得故。

Spiritualism is not truth. It’s just an form(belief) of existence, there’s no true oneness in spiritualism at any given point. But truth in-excludes all matter and anti-matter(consciousness). Science is not truth and never will be, because the observer will indefinitely in a state of division, to have something to proof or observe. What exists will always be a never ending journey, so never the truth.

What’s TRUE, on the contrary, will be all experience subjective to “believe” true. Until the belief is broken in the now, to become “untrue” and shift belief of experience to be true. We try to make sense of the past to not be contradictory of each true experience, we find explanation to include all experienced to be true in a one rule of thumb. And until an experience is not include in the belief to shift to a new belief. We come up with beliefs and theories, and we constantly are reframing, redefine it to include, or just “forget” the experience to make it unexisted in the consciousness perceived. The act of need of explanation makes us far from truth.

In search of meaning is the same, after we deceased into another form of being will be another experience that was excluded but need to include to make sense of what’s perceived to be happening. it’s an never ending loop of constant expanding new experiences.

So what we agree to be more “true” than the other “theory” or “belief” is simply a sense of phenomena perceived to be able to be include in the rule of thumb. Like scientists finding that one theory to explain every existence or experience will consider “truth”. But we can never be sure we won’t experience what is excluded from the former theory. Or be sure there’s a limited or an ending for new phenomenon. Then we can only get the conclusion that the universe is ever expanding, and we can never proof true of a belief or theory if there’s time involved. And we are experience things only within a human body, which is not really wide functioning in the world of living beings. Phenomenon a human can experience is sooooooo little, so science is just a working application in the smallest portion in this universe.

If only we can experience everything out of this body or in other animals or beings’ body, even beyond time and space, non matter phenomenons, will we be more closer to truth. Which we can’t really imagine right now.

Therefore in search of truth will never be external. It’s a contradictory that will never be able to be proven. Because proof itself has to be a external, mutual perceived phenomenon in two different consciousness. Which is another contradictory because unless the two consciousness become one, separated consciousness will never reach any true agreement of what’s perceived to be true. What exists is simply just never ending experience perceived to be true. Until there’s nothing and everything to perceive. But it’s no in a form of gradual process. It’s achievable at any given time and circumstances when you are ready. Because the nature of the truth, this will only be true.

Now the truth is “proven" within me, but the experience of truth still remains untrue for me in a sense where I am still existing as I am. 真理在我之內「得證」(因為證能得,真理不可得),在我之內之「不可得」之證悟尚未(不可說)....什麼呢?

此為閱讀:Jed McKenna’s the theory of everything 兩章時所啟發,後續閱讀時皆在推理上不謀而合。

avatar-img
《任性救贖》
27.6K會員
493內容數
曾經以「文飛(Dana)」這個名字創業、出書。為了更貼近自己,我成為嬋娜。希望我的一切創造,有機會觸碰到你的心。
留言
avatar-img
留言分享你的想法!
《任性救贖》 的其他內容
人離不開會忘不掉的絕不是某一個特定的人,而是這個人所代表的意義,是那個人曾經帶給自己的感受與體驗。 沒有人是不能被取代的,因為物質是虛的,而精神則是主觀而非客觀的。所以當你的對象有個無法忘記的人,你可以評估看看你到底有多少愛人的能力與餘裕。 如果你只是想談談戀愛,想要感受小情小愛,不是想給另
我認為男女之間有純友誼,但要看對象。 如果你對一個異性真的生理上有抗拒,那你們就有純友誼。但如果你對一個異性沒有抗拒,那你們之間就算只是友誼,也會多多少少有點男女之間的情愫在,但這充其量只是情「愫」,而不會發展成「情感」。 我覺得我還蠻喜歡男女之間的那一點點非純友誼的互動,例如當對方願意主動
最近真的覺得自己在感情裡長大了,很多事情學會不去較真。 最近也接觸了一些人看到他們處理感情的方式,讓我更鮮明的看見自己的進步。我現在覺得是否可以維持好一段關係,在於妳願意為對方做出多少的讓步。 然而我並不覺得這種讓步叫做犧牲,而是妳願意為對方的快樂去承擔的一些代價,而妳自己所得到的就是對方的開心
人離不開會忘不掉的絕不是某一個特定的人,而是這個人所代表的意義,是那個人曾經帶給自己的感受與體驗。 沒有人是不能被取代的,因為物質是虛的,而精神則是主觀而非客觀的。所以當你的對象有個無法忘記的人,你可以評估看看你到底有多少愛人的能力與餘裕。 如果你只是想談談戀愛,想要感受小情小愛,不是想給另
我認為男女之間有純友誼,但要看對象。 如果你對一個異性真的生理上有抗拒,那你們就有純友誼。但如果你對一個異性沒有抗拒,那你們之間就算只是友誼,也會多多少少有點男女之間的情愫在,但這充其量只是情「愫」,而不會發展成「情感」。 我覺得我還蠻喜歡男女之間的那一點點非純友誼的互動,例如當對方願意主動
最近真的覺得自己在感情裡長大了,很多事情學會不去較真。 最近也接觸了一些人看到他們處理感情的方式,讓我更鮮明的看見自己的進步。我現在覺得是否可以維持好一段關係,在於妳願意為對方做出多少的讓步。 然而我並不覺得這種讓步叫做犧牲,而是妳願意為對方的快樂去承擔的一些代價,而妳自己所得到的就是對方的開心