2024年上半年IELTS Writing Task 2議論文情蒐和關鍵論述
網路上的雅思考題未必是正確的，口說第二部分話題非常明顯，但大作文題目出錯的點比較微妙，特別是以華語為母語的考生不容易看到錯誤。歡迎自學雅思的考生多參考正確的版本。
Some people think that manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
有些人認為製造商和購物中心應該減少銷售包裝產品，而有些人則認為人們有責任購買較少包裝的產品。討論這兩種觀點並給出你自己的看法。
- 製造商和購物中心應該減少銷售包裝產品
- Manufacturers and retailers have the power to significantly reduce packaging waste at the source by redesigning products and changing their packaging practices. 製造商和零售商有能力通過重新設計產品和改變包裝方式，從源頭大幅減少包裝浪費。
- By offering more unpackaged or minimally packaged options, shopping malls can directly influence consumer behavior and promote more sustainable shopping habits. 通過提供更多無包裝或最少包裝的選擇，購物中心可以直接影響消費者行為，促進更可持續的購物習慣。
- 消費者有責任購買包裝較少的產品
- Consumers have the ultimate power of choice and can drive market change by consistently opting for products with less packaging. 消費者擁有最終的選擇權，可以通過持續選擇包裝較少的產品來推動市場變革。
- Individual responsibility and awareness are crucial in creating a sustainable society, and this includes making conscious decisions about the environmental impact of our purchases. 個人責任和意識對於創造一個可持續發展的社會至關重要，這包括對我們購買行為的環境影響做出有意識的決定。
Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth. However, some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
創新往往是由追求利潤和經濟成長所驅動的。然而，有些人認為應該優先解決社會和環境問題。討論這兩種觀點並給出你自己的看法。
- 支持以利潤和經濟增長驅動創新的證據
1. The development of smartphones has revolutionized communication and created a multi-billion dollar industry, driving economic growth and technological advancement.
智慧手機的發展徹底改變通訊方式，並創造一個價值數十億美元的產業，推動了經濟增長和技術進步。
2. The pursuit of profit in the pharmaceutical industry has led to the development of life-saving drugs and treatments, such as the rapid creation of COVID-19 vaccines.
製藥業對利潤的追求導致了挽救生命的藥物和治療方法的開發，例如迅速研製出COVID-19疫苗。
- 支持優先解決社會和環境問題的證據
1. The development of renewable energy technologies, such as solar panels and wind turbines, has been driven by the need to address climate change rather than immediate profit.
可再生能源技術的發展，如太陽能板和風力渦輪機，是由應對氣候變化的需求驅動的，而非立即的利潤。
2. Innovations in microfinance, like the Grameen Bank model, have focused on alleviating poverty and empowering marginalized communities, prioritizing social impact over maximizing profits.
小額信貸領域的創新，如格萊珉銀行模式，專注於緩解貧困和賦予邊緣化社區權力，將社會影響優先於利潤最大化。
The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age, with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent. Some people now think that online coaching is a superior option to in-person coach. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
數位時代隨著線上輔導平台的盛行，對輔導服務的需求顯著增長。現在有些人認為線上輔導是比面對面輔導更好的選擇。你在多大程度上同意或不同意？
- 支持線上輔導優於面對面輔導的論點
1. Flexibility and accessibility:
Online coaching platforms allow clients to access services from anywhere, at any time, making it easier to fit coaching into busy schedules.
靈活性和可及性：線上輔導平台允許客戶隨時隨地獲得服務，使得在繁忙的日程中安排輔導變得更加容易。
2. Global reach and diversity:
Online coaching enables access to a wider pool of coaches with diverse expertise and backgrounds, not limited by geographical constraints.
全球覆蓋和多樣性：線上輔導使人們可以接觸到更廣泛的、具有多樣化專業知識和背景的教練，不受地理限制。
- 反對線上輔導優於面對面輔導的論點
1. Limited non-verbal communication:
In-person coaching allows for better interpretation of body language and subtle cues, which can be crucial for building rapport and understanding.
非語言交流受限：面對面輔導允許更好地解讀肢體語言和細微線索，這對建立融洽關係和理解至關重要。
2. Technical limitations and distractions:
Online sessions can be disrupted by technical issues or home environment distractions, potentially reducing the effectiveness of the coaching.
技術限制和干擾：線上課程可能會受到技術問題或家庭環境干擾的影響，可能會降低輔導的有效性。
Some people feel that the private lives of celebrities should not be openly shared by the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
有些人覺得名人私生活不應被媒體公開分享。你在多大程度上同意或不同意呢？
- 支持觀點（同意名人私生活不應被公開分享）：
1. Celebrities, despite their public status, have a fundamental right to privacy that should be respected by the media and the public.
儘管名人有公眾身份，但他們仍然擁有應該被媒體和公眾尊重的基本隱私權。
2. Constant invasion of privacy can have severe negative impacts on celebrities' mental health and personal relationships, potentially affecting their professional performance.
持續侵犯隱私可能會對名人的心理健康和個人關係造成嚴重的負面影響，可能會影響他們的職業表現。
- 反對觀點（不同意名人私生活不應被公開分享）
1. Public figures, especially those who benefit from media attention, implicitly accept a certain level of public scrutiny as part of their celebrity status.
公眾人物，尤其是那些受益於媒體關注的人，隱含地接受了一定程度的公眾審視，這是他們名人身份的一部分。
2. Media coverage of celebrities' private lives can serve the public interest by exposing hypocrisy or illegal behavior, thus holding influential figures accountable.
媒體報導名人私生活可以通過揭露虛偽或非法行為來服務公眾利益，從而讓有影響力的人物負責。
Health services are a basic necessity. However, private companies have made them quite costly for ordinary individuals. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh its disadvantages?
健康服務是基本必需品。然而，私人公司的成本對於普通個人來說相當昂貴。私人醫療保健的優點是否大於其缺點？
- 支持私人醫療保健的論點
1. Quality and efficiency of care:
Private healthcare often provides faster access to specialists and advanced treatments, reducing waiting times and potentially improving health outcomes.
護理質量和效率：私人醫療通常能更快地獲得專科醫生和先進治療，減少等待時間，可能改善健康結果。
2. Innovation and investment:
Private healthcare companies often invest heavily in research and development, leading to medical advancements and innovative treatments.
創新和投資：私人醫療公司通常大量投資研發，促進醫學進步和創新治療方法的出現。
- 反對私人醫療保健的論點
1. Inequality in access:
High costs of private healthcare can create a two-tier system where quality care is only available to those who can afford it, exacerbating health inequalities.
獲取不平等：私人醫療的高成本可能會造成雙軌制，優質照護只有負擔得起的人才能獲得，加劇健康不平等。
2. Profit-driven care:
The focus on profitability in private healthcare can sometimes lead to unnecessary treatments or procedures, prioritizing financial gains over patient well-being.
以利潤為導向的健康照護：私人醫療對盈利的關注有時可能導致不必要的治療或程序，將財務收益置於患者福祉之上。
你可能也想看
