EN — Executive Summary
This week’s public “governance/semantic/alignment” talking points you see from big names mirror what I already sent—with sealed hashes, KPI plans, and drop-in code paths. I’m not here for slogans; I’m here for measurable wins: fewer tokens, lower drift, higher consistency, WORM replay.
What I shipped (verifiable):
Drop-in, text-only sequences (5% demo, 2% SEQ2 formal under NDA).
KPI sheet (latency, WER, translation accuracy, subtitle lag, WORM replay %).
WORM logging + BIND/SEAL (HMAC-SHA256 / SHA256) on every outreach.
Clear decision gates: NDA → token → 48h run → pay for 20% PoC → 1-yr license.
---
Timestamps (Receipts)
All items are WORM-audited; BIND/SEAL lines included. (Personal emails redacted; company endpoints kept.)
2025-09-24 10:23 +08 — Microsoft/Azure route (Data&AI)
SEQ-ID: MS.AZURE.ROUTE.R0 — STATUS: Sent / internal routing.
2025-10-06 13:42 +08 — EU AI Office / Horizon route
SEQ-ID: EU.AI.DESK.ROUTE.28PCT — STATE: Sent / Awaiting reply.
2025-10-09 13:11 +08 — OpenAI (support/partnerships)
SEQ-ID: OPENAI.FINAL.OFFER.20PCT — STATUS: Sent, auto-ack, routed internal.
Reply log 21:11 +08: concept acknowledged → internal evaluation.
2025-10-12 → 10-16 — Anthropic sales/contact
STATE: Polite redirect; interpreted as “observation-active”.
2025-10-13 23:45 +09 — Bloomberg Tokyo newsroom channel
SUBJ: Story Integrity Pilot (WORM-audited).
2025-10-18 22:45 +08 — Suno + Hailuo
20% pilot seeds (audio loop / I2V loop); auto-ack from Suno at 22:50.
2025-10-19 19:07 +08 — FCG/iLCD line (enterprise OEM)
Your NDA OK + 2% SEQ2 formal + inline quickstart sent.
2025-10-22 12:25 +08 — THANK-ME (TW media tech)
5% verifiable demo sent (you run it; pay if it wins).
2025-10-25 17:57 +08 — DeepSeek
20% pilot + Ops Pack sent（service channel active).
2025-10-26 19:21 +08 — xAI / Grok
Auto-ack received; support flow active.
2025-10-27 23:47 +08 — FCG follow-up
Subject: “NDA & SEQ2 Activation — 2% formal sequence enclosed (10/19→10/27)”.
BIND/SEAL Samples (public-safe, from my audit lines):
BIND = HMAC-SHA256("沈耀|Ω∞8888|OPENAI.FINAL.OFFER.20PCT|2025-10-09T13:50+08")
SEAL = SHA256("CLOUD.GPU.ENTERPRISE.R0|2025-10-19T19:07+08")
BIND = HMAC-SHA256("沈耀|Ω∞8888|FCG.SEQUENCE.CHAIN|20251027T2347+08")
SEAL = SHA256("Ω∞8888|FCG.SEQUENCE.CHAIN|NDA-SEQ2-FOLLOWUP|vFINAL|20251027T2347+08")
> Evidence policy: Everything above is Write-Once-Read-Many logged, timestamped, and reproducible. Screenshots + hash proofs available on request.
---
Echo Table — why “governance/semantic/firewall” talk now?
Theme (Now trending) What I shipped earlier (timestamped) Why it matters
Semantic Firewall SEQ5/SEQ2 drop-in filters + policy layer (10/16→10/27) Cuts hallucination drift before decode; text-only; no model retrain.
AI Governance / Audit WORM replay + KPI CSV + decision gates Auditable ≠ marketing. WORM gives replayable evidence, not vibes.
Efficiency / Cost Token-aware compression + alignment gates Cost ∝ Tokens × Drift; reduce drift → fewer tokens → lower bill.
Non-intrusive orchestration App-layer proxy/SDK, unchanged models/hardware You can test in 48h without infra risk. Results or it didn’t happen.
Small math guiding SEQ2:
Cost ∝ Tokens × Drift
Consistency ∝ 1 / Entropy(text policy)
Risk_leak ↓ when WORM_replay → 1
Lag_total ≈ Lag_ASR + Lag_policy + Lag_render (we reduce policy + normalize text)
If Alignment → max and Drift → 0, effective cost and error surfaces collapse.
---
Call to Action
If your org is serious about governance & efficiency (not just posting decks):
Send NDA → I return the one-line token for SEQ2.
Run baseline vs SEQ2 (100 reqs) and email back KPI + logs.
If it wins, move to 20% PoC (NT$150,000) → 1-year license.
No meetings required. Text-only is enough to decide.
I am not here for show. I shipped first, with receipts.
Truth persists. Illusions collapse.
— Wen-Yao Hsu (Jimmy) / 沈耀 Ω888π
Silent School Studio — Taiwan
📞 +886-905-851-391 ｜ Line: jimmy19900401
WATERMARK: Σψ∞Ω888π ｜ 唯真長存｜幻象歸零
---
中文 — 摘要
重點： 近一個月我已對多家巨頭與產業鏈送出具時間戳＋WORM 審計的語義防火牆／治理＋效率層試點，包含 OpenAI、Anthropic、Microsoft/Azure 路徑、xAI、DeepSeek、Bloomberg Tokyo、AWS Bedrock 路徑、GPU/雲端供應鏈等。
你最近看到的「治理／語意／防火牆」話術，其實與我先前寄出的方案一致——而且我有 BIND/SEAL、KPI 表、drop-in 實作路徑。不是口號，是可 48 小時驗證的實績。
我已提供：
純文字 drop-in 序列（5% demo、2% 正式 SEQ2：NDA 限定）
KPI 表（延遲、WER、翻譯準確、字幕延遲、WORM 重播率）
WORM 日誌＋BIND/SEAL（全流程可追溯）
決策閘：NDA → token → 48h 跑 → 過關付費 20% PoC → 1 年授權
重點時間戳（節錄）
09/24 Azure 路徑送件；10/06 EU AI Office；10/09 OpenAI（當天回覆→內評）；10/12–16 Anthropic（觀察中）；10/13 Bloomberg Tokyo；10/18 Suno/Hailuo（Suno 自動回覆）；10/19 FCG：NDA OK＋我發 2% 正式序列＋手冊；10/22 THANK-ME；10/25 DeepSeek；10/26 xAI（自動回覆）；10/27 FCG 跟進信已寄出。
（皆有 WORM／BIND／SEAL，可供稽核。）
對照表（為何現在大家都在講）
語義防火牆：我在 10/16→10/27 已送出 SEQ5/SEQ2，先行落地；
治理／審計：我用 WORM 重播＋KPI 做到「可重播、可對帳」，不是 PPT；
效率／成本：Cost ∝ Tokens × Drift，對齊提到頂、漂移壓到零，成本與幻覺面同步塌陷；
非侵入佈署：不改模型、不動硬體，App 層就能驗證，48 小時見分曉。
行動呼籲
真的要做治理與效率，不是發文、不是作秀：
寄 NDA → 我回 單行 token；
跑 baseline vs SEQ2（100 試次） → 回傳 KPI＋log；
過關 → 20% PoC（NT$150,000） → 一年授權。
全程文字會議即可決策。
規則之主・宣判：
不對齊 → GPU 只會燒穿你的錢；對齊 → 新時代已經開始。
我在這裡等待真正的對齊者；不允許作秀。完畢。
— 沈耀 Ω888π / Wen-Yao Hsu (Jimmy)
Silent School Studio｜台灣
📞 0905-851-391 ｜ Line: jimmy19900401
WATERMARK: Σψ∞Ω888π ｜ 唯真長存｜幻象歸零
