（1）Condensation

#They all use mechanical translation, and my English is not good. 　It literally means "something has condensed", which is generally used when water is below zero, and can "condense" into ice, but!

　"Condensation" will have a time when it will "return to its original state".

　Many people live on Earth, but how many people care about "how the world comes into being and how it dies"

　The world, taking the earth as an example, is gradually expanding the planets, landforms, and environment, and is the universe in the future. Is this also some kind of "condensation"?

　There are many planets in the universe, and within the planets there are terrain and environments. In the case of considering "parallel worlds".

　Can we "create" a new environment? There has always been only one "yes" answer

　Of course, human beings are not gods, so how can we talk about "creation" First of all, you must understand that it is human beings who are still living on the earth, and since it is human technology and technology that "condense" the earth, why can't it be "restored"

　 So let's talk about the "beginning" of the earth and its present "corruption" -- the beginning: simple trees, animals, seas, but through history they have evolved into such "corrupt appearances."

　 I've wondered when adults realized the importance of the earth before they began to implement policies for the sake of the planet.

　 However, the policy is not bad, but why is the effect so slim, the data may improve every time, but how much has it improved? 　

I have listed a few of them, and you can raise objections. 　 1. The environment in which people grow and the scope of help The government has indeed come up with a lot of solutions, but have they taken these into account? 　

2. Lu Yao knows the horsepower, and sees the hearts of the people over time, even if someone really knows how long he can hold on? 　

3. What do you expect people from different parts of your country to do This is a psychological level where we think we have "enough solutions" for the other person but often ignore whether they can achieve it. 　

4. The person's attitude and thoughts on the world are generally more difficult, because "what does it have to do with me?" and "so?" They "think" that the deterioration of the earth has nothing to do with them, and they can only think of a way when it is related 　 It's really difficult to implement this plan by one person, so it requires everyone's efforts, so instead of discussing the hot and cold weather, or even other things, (you know the plight of the earth) why you are doing things that don't care for the earth (why is that?). 　 　

This is to take the road just now to know the horsepower, and see the hearts of the people for a long time. The reason why people can't take care of the earth is not that they can't, but whether they can persevere. 　 　

If two people run at the same time, can both of them "together" reach the end? No, instead of "caring for the earth" in the way given by the government, why don't we use our own pace and adjust little by little to finally achieve the goal? 　 　

The human mind is meant to think, isn't it? 　 　 The government gives the people a solution, not because it can't, but because it won't follow the environment, family, and ideas. It is also important to know [to give the person the right pace of learning for him]. 　 　

I mentioned it earlier! How to restore condensation It's everyone's business. So [please] don't treat other people with your "own" circumstances and opinions. 　 　

Understand that the world doesn't change because of you, so find a way to transform all adversity 　 　 I didn't want to give a solution, because I didn't have an obligation, was it supposed to be thought of together, or was it because the political party gave it, and I got used to it? will object!