Critical Review of News,“Better.com CEO fires 900 employees”

更新於 發佈於 閱讀時間約 31 分鐘
raw-image

Critical Review of News, “Better.com CEO fires 900 employees over Zoom”

Introduction

Journalist Ramishah Maruf has published controversial news "Better.com CEO fires 900 employees over Zoom" on the CNN Business website. Vishal Garg, a mortgage company Better.com CEO recently courted controversy by laying off about 9% of employees over a single Zoom call ahead of the holiday season. According to the now-viral video, "If you are on this call, you are part of the unlucky group that is being laid off; your employment here is terminated effective immediately", Garg announced abruptly to the workforces on the call. Fortune also reported that Garg accused the staff of 'stealing' from their colleagues and customers through unproductive working performance, only working two hours a day. In a statement of CFO Kevin Ryan said, "Having to conduct layoffs is gut-wrenching, especially this time of year; however, a fortress balance sheet and a reduced and focused workforce together set us up to play offence going into a radically evolving homeownership market." After the CEO layoffs incident, three Better.com executives resigned, the public listing plan was postponed.

Summary of key points

Whether called 'layoffs', 'rightsizing', 'downsizing', since the late 1980s, cannot deny that American companies have been reducing the scales of their workforces at alarming rates." (Levy, 2017, p. 384). The pandemic outbreak brings damage to the job market on another level and may seem profound and long-lasting because Covid-19 continues to evolve. Employees facing challenge stress might be getting dismissal; the management has to deal with the pressure and sorrow of downsizing a large number of employees and also feel latent anxiety about their positions at the same time. How the management let employees go matters for the company's reputation, and the way the CEO's actions made the situation even worse brings more hidden costs for the company. Cutback may be an economic reality, but still can handle them professionally.

Critique

  1. Failing to give their employees human dignity and compassion

The proper way of firing someone is to break the bad news face-to-face (Vasel, 2018). While texting and emailing all play an important role in communication, face-to-face communication is still the best way to go. To terminate employment is one of them. Everyone's reaction to being fired will be a little different, and when it comes time to let workers know about upcoming staffing changes, management needs to find a private place to have a one-on-one conversation (which can also include a human resource representative). Employees should not be made to feel on display when they receive the news. During a Coronavirus crisis, remotely laying off staff seems to be the only viable option, whether via phone call or video conference, still can show human dignity and compassion.

Try to avoid a masse group Zoom. Not everyone will suspect that layoffs are coming; the reaction might cry or reach acceptance immediately in a myriad of ways. Some people will have an emotionally overwhelming and stressful experience, shame, anger, loss of self-esteem, etc. (Stanford University). It is disrespectful letting that happen on the camcorder in front of people. The coronavirus has made it more difficult for everyone's life; usually, 'home' is a person's safe zone, so it is more personally invasive to tell staff with bad news within earshot of their family than in the office. During these transitional times, employees want most to believe that the layoffs are being done fairly (Brockner, 2006). Therefore, maximise employees' privacy and suggest they stay in some quiet place, and family members are not around while making this phone call, preserve dignity and respect during the termination.

Do not cut contact too soon. According to Ramishah Maruf's report, some fired employees indicate that when the meeting ended, they tried to ask what was going on through the company's Slack channels, their screens went black, and they lost access to the company computer, email, phone, and messaging immediately. Laying off people may be a difficult chore for the leaders, but for an employee might be traumatic. Research has shown that being unemployed is consistently among the top ten most stressful things in a person's life (Levy, 2017, p. 383). From a former Better.com employee perspective, being layoff within a surprise three-minute online meeting and suddenly turned off access to the platform, feeling numb and isolated, is a grieving process (Latifi, 2021). For some people, colleagues are like part of their extended family. Landy & Conte (2016) indicated that losing a job can be devastating to the employee because they may still have continuance, affective, and normative commitments to the organisation. With an economic recession due to the pandemic, the unemployment rate increases, resulting in psychological well-being becoming a major global concern (Godinic et al., 2020). It is vital that helping hand make connections for those in transition, feel less stress and more severe mental health concerns such as depression and anxiety disorders, be compassionate for the departing employee, and express gratitude for their dedication to the work. Show kindness and offer some help, do not cut contact too soon, try to make the transition as smooth as possible.

2. Reputational damage

A firm's reputation, one of the most familiar but least understood intangible assets (Cole, 2012). The harmful effects of layoffs are not only on the fired employees but also the organisation that implemented the layoffs; Better.com's has suffered a significant blow due to laying off incidents and brings a very high cost of a bad reputation, making it hard to recruit new talent and undermine employee retention, increase staff costs and hit operate margins.

Talent recruit is drastically impacted by corporate reputation. With the popularity of review sites such as Glassdoor, LinkedIn, Fairygodboss and CareerBliss, which has become a great way to vet and attract staff, companies have been forced to think deeper about reputation and the hiring process's effects on the company culture. According to the statistics, sixty-nine per cent of potential candidates would not accept an offer with a company by a bad reputation, even if they were unemployed; And eighty-four per cent of current employees might square up leaving current jobs if offered another position with a company that had a positive reputation (Glassdoor Team, 2019). With the leaked layoff footage going viral, Better.com has got negative news coverage and a social media tongue lashing; the CEO blames difficult market conditions due to the layoffs, and those who were fired include diversity, equity and inclusion recruitment team; but it turns out that the firm had just gotten a $750 million cash infusion recently. Not being honest about the layoff reasons and situation, Better.com is getting crushed on the job review website. Businesses operating in a new era of employee brands must be aligned with their public brand, and clearly, Better.com's internal actions and external brand are not aligned. As a result, the layoff incident has created a significant recruitment problem.

Companies cannot recover from major problems overnight, and hidden costs increase. Many organisations via downsizing to enhance economic benefits; however, the reach from Cascio (2009) point out numerous of the expected benefits of the layoff did not materialise. The fallout from how the CEO handled the layoffs has been widespread; the fourth quarter of the 2021 public listing plan has been delayed. Increasing severance to handle the disastrous cutbacks potential lawsuits, the company's marketing heads, Melanie Hahn, the company's VP of communications, Patrick Lenihan; and head of public relations, Tanya Gillogley;  have all resigned at a time when companies sorely need help in all those fields (Mary, 2021). It is demoralising and kills productivity when multiple employees resign simultaneously, can sap remaining employees' trust and enthusiasm; a powerful psychological effect, 'turnover contagion', occurs when key employees resign (Felps et al., 2009), seeing colleague leave which can motivate people to start thinking about if the grass is greener on another side. Studies show that when employees show pride in their workplace, they attract customers, increasing revenue twofold compared to competitors without a committed and engaged workforce (Bardwick, 2008). A good leader should be strengthening employee recruitment and retention to prevent being left captain a ship without a crew.

Conclusion

In summary, all online issues start offline, and in most cases, there are internal fixes that can prevent online problems from occurring. It is not a case against firing people; unfortunately, that is part of life; this is a case for basic human dignity. Treating employees well is more than just an ornament - it is critical to the company's bottom line. It is crucial in a compassionate and human dignity way to handle a mass cutback in a professional that helps maintain productivity, avoid legal liability, and keep the positive company reputation for attracting talent in the future. Companies need to have clear, well-communicated; by covering all bases of employee risk, the potential for damage to a company's reputation can be minimised. Sometimes layoff is necessary, but the company's leaders must think over and understand the short- and long-term costs or other available alternatives to layoff.

Bibliography

Bardwick, J.M. (2008). One foot out the door: How to combat the psychological recession that's alienating employees and hurting American business. New York: AMACOM Books.

Brockner, J. (2006). Why it's so hard to be fair. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 122–129. https://europepmc.org/article/med/16515160

Cascio, W. F. (2009). Employment Downsizing and Its Alternatives: Strategies for Long-Term Success. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Foundation.

Cole, S. (2012). The impact of reputation on market value. World Economics-Abingdon, 13(3), 47.https://www.reputationdividend.com/files/4713/4822/1479/Reputation_Dividend_WEC_133_Cole.pdf

Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., Hekman, D. R., Lee, T. W., Holtom, B. C., & Harman, W. S. (2009). Turnover Contagion: How Coworkers’ Job Embeddedness and Job Search Behaviors Influence Quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 545–561. https://go.exlibris.link/YWSrQlvm

Godinic, D., Obrenovic, B., & Khudaykulov, A. (2020). Effects of Economic Uncertainty on Mental Health in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context: Social Identity Disturbance, Job Uncertainty and Psychological Well-Being Model. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 6(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.61.2005

Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2016). Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. John Wiley & Sons.

Latifi, F. (2021, December 10). I’m one of 900 employees Better.com fired in a surprise 3-minute Zoom. Telling my kids was the hardest part. Business Insider. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://www.businessinsider.com/better-com-layoffs-900-employees-it-was-a-gut-punch-2021-12?international=true&r=US&IR=T

Levy, P. E. (2017). Industrial/organizational psychology: Understanding the workplace (5th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

Stanford University. (n.d.). Coping with the Emotional Impact of a Layoff. Faculty Staff Help Center. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://helpcenter.stanford.edu/resources/work-related-resources/coping-emotional-impact-layoff

Vasel, K. (2018, March 15). The right way to fire an employee. CNNMoney. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://money.cnn.com/2018/03/15/pf/jobs/how-to-fire-employee/index.html

Glassdoor Team. (2019, September 16). Why Does Your Company’s Reputation Matter? US | Glassdoor for Employers. Retrieved December 22, 2021, from https://www.glassdoor.com/employers/blog/quiz-why-does-your-companys-reputation-matter/

Mary, A. (2021, December 8). Better.com’s PR, comms, marketing heads submit resignations in wake of layoffs fiasco. TechCrunch. Retrieved December 22, 2021, from https://techcrunch.com/2021/12/07/better-coms-pr-comms-marketing-heads-submit-resignations-in-wake-of-layoffs-fiasco/


留言
avatar-img
留言分享你的想法!
avatar-img
Steffani Chen的沙龍
18會員
18內容數
「只有人權被重視時,和平才會存在。」—第十四世達賴喇嘛 教育不會立竿見影,但卻是解決衝突的關鍵,用文化觀念看待人類生存的脈絡,在這裡我們一起反思與討論生活周遭的「人權議題」
Steffani Chen的沙龍的其他內容
2024/08/28
本文回顧2023年臺灣MeToo運動,探討受害者譴責的心理影響及社會氛圍。針對眾多受害者在指責聲中感受到的羞愧與孤立,分析社交媒體的雙面作用與社會對於「完美受害者」的偏見。文中提及如何應對受害者指責問題,旨在提升對性騷擾及其影響的理解,並倡導建立支持性環境,促進社會的平等與正義。
Thumbnail
2024/08/28
本文回顧2023年臺灣MeToo運動,探討受害者譴責的心理影響及社會氛圍。針對眾多受害者在指責聲中感受到的羞愧與孤立,分析社交媒體的雙面作用與社會對於「完美受害者」的偏見。文中提及如何應對受害者指責問題,旨在提升對性騷擾及其影響的理解,並倡導建立支持性環境,促進社會的平等與正義。
Thumbnail
2024/08/13
本文探討了家庭內耗如何比家庭貧窮對家庭功能造成更大的威脅。家庭內耗源於成員間的情感問題和無效溝通,導致情緒困擾和人際關係的長期影響。文章分析了內耗的成因、與貧窮的比較以及其對個人心理健康的重要性,並提出改善家庭內部關係的策略,從而促進更健康的家庭環境以應對內外挑戰。
Thumbnail
2024/08/13
本文探討了家庭內耗如何比家庭貧窮對家庭功能造成更大的威脅。家庭內耗源於成員間的情感問題和無效溝通,導致情緒困擾和人際關係的長期影響。文章分析了內耗的成因、與貧窮的比較以及其對個人心理健康的重要性,並提出改善家庭內部關係的策略,從而促進更健康的家庭環境以應對內外挑戰。
Thumbnail
2024/01/17
「嫁給我吧!」、「讓我給你幸福!」 「我」原本應該是中性的詞,可是上述兩句的「我」有多少人腦海中是預設了由「你」來完成?這樣的男性角色設定根植於多少女性的心? 女性在「Hypergamy 慕強擇偶」話題中的角色 男性要承擔求婚的角色到什麼時候? 「女性主義毀掉我的戀情」
Thumbnail
2024/01/17
「嫁給我吧!」、「讓我給你幸福!」 「我」原本應該是中性的詞,可是上述兩句的「我」有多少人腦海中是預設了由「你」來完成?這樣的男性角色設定根植於多少女性的心? 女性在「Hypergamy 慕強擇偶」話題中的角色 男性要承擔求婚的角色到什麼時候? 「女性主義毀掉我的戀情」
Thumbnail
看更多
你可能也想看
Thumbnail
2025 vocus 推出最受矚目的活動之一——《開箱你的美好生活》,我們跟著創作者一起「開箱」各種故事、景點、餐廳、超值好物⋯⋯甚至那些讓人會心一笑的生活小廢物;這次活動不僅送出了許多獎勵,也反映了「內容有價」——創作不只是分享、紀錄,也能用各種不同形式變現、帶來實際收入。
Thumbnail
2025 vocus 推出最受矚目的活動之一——《開箱你的美好生活》,我們跟著創作者一起「開箱」各種故事、景點、餐廳、超值好物⋯⋯甚至那些讓人會心一笑的生活小廢物;這次活動不僅送出了許多獎勵,也反映了「內容有價」——創作不只是分享、紀錄,也能用各種不同形式變現、帶來實際收入。
Thumbnail
最近,在一次聚會中,朋友分享了一個困擾他多日的工作煩事。他花盡心力培育的一位主管,上週突然交了辭職信。得知此消息後,朋友盡全力挽留,但這位主管的決心已定,辭意決絕。主管表示,這個決定也是經過深思熟慮的,並非一時衝動朋友倍感錯愕,因為他投入了很多心血來培養這位主管,現在卻「功虧一簣」。 我拍拍他的肩膀
Thumbnail
最近,在一次聚會中,朋友分享了一個困擾他多日的工作煩事。他花盡心力培育的一位主管,上週突然交了辭職信。得知此消息後,朋友盡全力挽留,但這位主管的決心已定,辭意決絕。主管表示,這個決定也是經過深思熟慮的,並非一時衝動朋友倍感錯愕,因為他投入了很多心血來培養這位主管,現在卻「功虧一簣」。 我拍拍他的肩膀
Thumbnail
前陣子社群媒體龍頭臉書啟動第二輪裁員,一覺醒來,一萬人丟了工作;一名去年7月才剛升官的女性主管不滿表示,進入夢寐以求的公司、順利升遷,正在執行重要專案,豈知……簡單一封電子郵件,就讓一萬人丟了飯碗。職場如戰場,冷血又無情,六七年級生應該都對2008年金融風暴引發大規模裁員印象深刻。
Thumbnail
前陣子社群媒體龍頭臉書啟動第二輪裁員,一覺醒來,一萬人丟了工作;一名去年7月才剛升官的女性主管不滿表示,進入夢寐以求的公司、順利升遷,正在執行重要專案,豈知……簡單一封電子郵件,就讓一萬人丟了飯碗。職場如戰場,冷血又無情,六七年級生應該都對2008年金融風暴引發大規模裁員印象深刻。
Thumbnail
【面對大量人員流失,管理層有何辦法?】 一場疫情,企業的營運方式及人力資源管理策略必定發生巨大轉變並迎來挑戰,據美國勞工統計局報告顯示,當地於2021年11月有450萬人辭職,創紀錄的形成了大型的辭職趨勢。觸發大辭職潮(Great Resignation),企業面對人員流失,管理層需想辦法保留或招聘
Thumbnail
【面對大量人員流失,管理層有何辦法?】 一場疫情,企業的營運方式及人力資源管理策略必定發生巨大轉變並迎來挑戰,據美國勞工統計局報告顯示,當地於2021年11月有450萬人辭職,創紀錄的形成了大型的辭職趨勢。觸發大辭職潮(Great Resignation),企業面對人員流失,管理層需想辦法保留或招聘
Thumbnail
大多數企業,正為了從未料想過的「大離職潮」(The Great Resignation),而傷透腦筋。創造一個「以員工為中心」的企業文化或職場,是在後疫情時代更為激烈的全球人才大戰中,企業必須調整的經營思維。本文分享了五項具體實踐,提供企業在人才管理領域,進行反思。
Thumbnail
大多數企業,正為了從未料想過的「大離職潮」(The Great Resignation),而傷透腦筋。創造一個「以員工為中心」的企業文化或職場,是在後疫情時代更為激烈的全球人才大戰中,企業必須調整的經營思維。本文分享了五項具體實踐,提供企業在人才管理領域,進行反思。
Thumbnail
做一份「願意」的工作吧! 近期台灣疫情嚴峻,不少公司都已採取居家辦公或是分流上班,一些服務業則是採自主停業。這一切都是為了確保公司員工的身體健康受到保障,然而這段時間卻發生了日趨增加的離職潮,雇主開始大量缺少人力,勞資雙方比例產生極大的失衡,為甚麼會這樣呢?是甚麼讓員工開始思考去留? 謝謝!
Thumbnail
做一份「願意」的工作吧! 近期台灣疫情嚴峻,不少公司都已採取居家辦公或是分流上班,一些服務業則是採自主停業。這一切都是為了確保公司員工的身體健康受到保障,然而這段時間卻發生了日趨增加的離職潮,雇主開始大量缺少人力,勞資雙方比例產生極大的失衡,為甚麼會這樣呢?是甚麼讓員工開始思考去留? 謝謝!
Thumbnail
Critical Review of News, “Better.com CEO fires 900 employees over Zoom” Introduction Summary of key points Critique 2. Reputational damage Conclusion
Thumbnail
Critical Review of News, “Better.com CEO fires 900 employees over Zoom” Introduction Summary of key points Critique 2. Reputational damage Conclusion
追蹤感興趣的內容從 Google News 追蹤更多 vocus 的最新精選內容追蹤 Google News